Samuel M, Duncan J S
National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1994 Nov;57(11):1417-8. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.57.11.1417.
Epilepsy is primarily a clinical diagnosis and eye witness accounts are invaluable in the differential diagnosis of seizures, but may be incomplete or misleading. A hand held video camcorder was used in this study to record seizures of patients to clarify the nature of their attacks. The videotapes assisted the diagnosis of non-epileptic attacks in nine of 22 patients (41%), and of epileptic attacks in eight of 22 patients (36%). Interactions with patients during filming were particularly helpful. Five patients (23%) could not be filmed, three of whom had seizures that were too shortlived to be recorded. In two patients (9%) a confident diagnosis of non-epileptic seizures could be made from the videotapes alone. Seven patients subsequently required video-EEG telemetry. It is concluded that the hand held video camera is a useful and inexpensive tool to provide accurate seizure descriptions, but it should be used in conjunction with other evidence to classify seizures.
癫痫主要是一种临床诊断,目击者的描述对癫痫发作的鉴别诊断非常重要,但可能不完整或有误导性。本研究使用手持摄像机记录患者的发作情况,以明确其发作的性质。录像带协助诊断出22例患者中的9例(41%)为非癫痫性发作,22例患者中的8例(36%)为癫痫性发作。拍摄过程中与患者的互动特别有帮助。5例患者(23%)无法拍摄,其中3例发作时间过短无法记录。2例患者(9%)仅凭录像带就能确诊为非癫痫性发作。7例患者随后需要进行视频脑电图遥测。结论是,手持摄像机是一种有用且廉价的工具,可提供准确的发作描述,但应结合其他证据对发作进行分类。