Parati G, Ravogli A, Frattola A, Groppelli A, Ulian L, Santucciu C, Mancia G
Istituto Scientifico Ospedale S. Luca, Centro Auxologico Italiano, University of Milan, Italy.
J Hypertens Suppl. 1994 Jul;12(5):S35-40.
HYPOTHESIS ON RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN BLOOD PRESSURE VARIABILITY AND END-ORGAN DAMAGE: Several studies have shown that the cardiovascular complications of hypertension are more closely related to ambulatory 24-h or daytime average blood pressure than to office readings. A few studies have also provided evidence that in hypertensive patients, not only average ambulatory blood pressure but also the degree of blood pressure variability is significantly and independently related to the end-organ damage associated with hypertension. LIMITATIONS OF PREVIOUS STUDIES: A common limitation of previous studies is that they were based on cross-sectional or retrospective observations, so that the correlative evidence they provide does not allow the relationship between blood pressure variability and end-organ damage to be interpreted causally. EVIDENCE FROM RECENT STUDIES: Recent evidence from follow-up observations has strongly supported the hypothesis that blood pressure variability is prognostically important in hypertensive patients. These findings suggest that optimal antihypertensive treatment should aim not only to reduce mean blood pressure levels, but also to reduce the degree of blood pressure fluctuation. EFFECTS OF ANTIHYPERTENSIVE DRUGS: Unfortunately, while most new antihypertensive drugs seem to be effective in reducing 24-h mean blood pressure levels, they are frequently unable to reduce 24-h blood pressure variability, which is often increased during treatment when expressed in normalized units. The development of drugs that guarantee a constant and uniform reduction in blood pressure over 24 h may, in principle, offer a further advantage by preventing the increase in 24-h blood pressure fluctuations that may follow the administration of short-acting antihypertensive agents. TROUGH: PEAK MEASUREMENTS OF BLOOD PRESSURE: The trough: peak ratio, proposed as an arithmetic indicator of the duration of the antihypertensive effect of a drug, may be a useful measure of the occurrence of a smooth reduction in blood pressure over 24 h. The possibility of obtaining an additional reduction in cardiovascular risk for hypertensive patients by minimizing the net trough: peak effect of antihypertensive drugs is thus an important issue for future studies.
多项研究表明,高血压的心血管并发症与24小时动态血压或日间平均血压的关系比与诊室血压的关系更为密切。一些研究还提供了证据,表明在高血压患者中,不仅动态平均血压,而且血压变异性程度都与高血压相关的靶器官损害显著且独立相关。既往研究的局限性:既往研究的一个常见局限性是它们基于横断面或回顾性观察,因此它们提供的相关证据不允许对血压变异性与靶器官损害之间的关系进行因果解释。近期研究的证据:随访观察的最新证据有力地支持了以下假说,即血压变异性在高血压患者的预后中具有重要意义。这些发现表明,最佳的降压治疗不仅应旨在降低平均血压水平,还应旨在降低血压波动程度。抗高血压药物的作用:不幸的是,虽然大多数新型抗高血压药物似乎在降低24小时平均血压水平方面有效,但它们往往无法降低24小时血压变异性,当以标准化单位表示时,这种变异性在治疗期间经常会增加。原则上,开发能保证在24小时内持续且均匀降低血压的药物可能会带来进一步的优势,即防止使用短效抗高血压药物后可能出现的24小时血压波动增加。血压谷值:峰值测量:作为药物降压作用持续时间的算术指标提出的谷值:峰值比,可能是衡量24小时内血压平稳降低情况的有用指标。因此,通过最小化抗高血压药物的净谷值:峰值效应来进一步降低高血压患者心血管风险的可能性是未来研究的一个重要问题。