Mancia G, Omboni S, Parati G
Ospedale S. Gerardo, Monza, Italy.
Kidney Int Suppl. 1996 Jun;55:S63-8.
A number of cross sectional studies have shown that both the 24-hour average blood pressure value and the degree of 24-hour blood pressure variability bear a significant relation with the end organ damage of hypertension. Although longitudinal evidence of the clinical relevance of 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring data are scanty, the results of a recent prospective study have clearly shown the superiority of average 24 hour, daytime and nighttime blood pressure values over clinical readings in predicting the regression of left ventricular hypertrophy in treated hypertensive patients. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring may also be useful in the evaluation of antihypertensive treatment, although the problem of whether ambulatory blood pressure is "normalized" by treatment remains still to be properly addressed. Moreover, currently employed discontinuous ambulatory blood pressure monitoring devices cannot adequately clarify the ability of antihypertensive drugs to buffer blood pressure variability. This interesting issue needs to be assessed in a more analytical fashion by means of recently developed beat-to-beat non-invasive ambulatory blood pressure recorders coupled with wide-band spectral analysis techniques.
多项横断面研究表明,24小时平均血压值和24小时血压变异性程度均与高血压终末器官损害显著相关。尽管24小时动态血压监测数据临床相关性的纵向证据不足,但最近一项前瞻性研究结果清楚地表明,在预测接受治疗的高血压患者左心室肥厚消退方面,24小时平均血压值、日间和夜间血压值优于临床测量值。动态血压监测在评估降压治疗中也可能有用,尽管治疗是否使动态血压“正常化”的问题仍有待妥善解决。此外,目前使用的间断动态血压监测设备无法充分阐明降压药物缓冲血压变异性的能力。这个有趣的问题需要通过最近开发的逐搏无创动态血压记录仪结合宽带频谱分析技术,以更具分析性的方式进行评估。