Pantle M L, Barger C G, Hamilton M C, Thornton S S, Piersma H L
Department of Psychology, Baylor University, Waco, TX 76798-7334.
J Pers Assess. 1994 Oct;63(2):327-37. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6302_11.
Of 81 adolescent inpatients with elevated (> 74) admission scores on scale 6 (forceful/antisocial) of the Millon Adolescent Personality Inventory (MAPI; Millon, Green, & Meagher, 1982), 44 (54.32%) continued to have elevated scale 6 scores on the discharge administration of the test. These 44 subjects (labeled High 6) did not differ significantly from the other 37 subjects (labeled Low 6) on several variables that have been associated with conduct disturbance. The two groups did differ significantly, however, on family size, parental (especially paternal) psychopathology, and prognosis. The High 6 group tended to come from larger families, had a higher frequency of parental pathology, and more often received negative prognoses than did the Low 6 group. A discriminant function analysis conducted on the MAPI expressed concerns scales on the admission administration of the test resulted in a 76.54% correct classification of subjects into the High 6 and Low 6 groups. In general, the High 6 subjects appeared less troubled and more trouble than those subjects in the Low 6 group. The findings of this study demonstrate the potential of the MAPI as a component in the assessment of the treatment amenability of adolescents with disruptive behavior disorders.
在81名青少年住院患者中,他们在米隆青少年人格问卷(MAPI;米隆、格林和米agher,1982)的第6量表(强硬/反社会)上的入院得分高于74,其中44名(54.32%)在出院时进行该测试时第6量表得分仍然较高。这44名受试者(标记为高6组)在与品行障碍相关的几个变量上与其他37名受试者(标记为低6组)没有显著差异。然而,两组在家庭规模、父母(尤其是父亲)精神病理学和预后方面确实存在显著差异。高6组往往来自大家庭,父母精神病理学发生率更高,与低6组相比,更常得到负面预后。对MAPI入院时所表达的关注量表进行判别函数分析,结果将受试者正确分类到高6组和低6组的准确率为76.54%。总体而言,高6组受试者看起来比低6组受试者更少困扰但更多麻烦。本研究结果表明,MAPI作为评估有破坏性行为障碍青少年治疗适宜性的一个组成部分具有潜力。