Kapur K K, Deupree R, Dent R J, Hasse A L
West Los Angeles Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Calif.
J Prosthet Dent. 1994 Sep;72(3):268-82. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(94)90340-9.
A randomized clinical trial was undertaken to compare the effectiveness of two partial denture designs, one with I-bar (bar) and the other with circumferential retainers (circumferential), in 134 patients with Kennedy class I and class II edentulous conditions. A total of 30 partial dentures were considered failures, five because of abutment failures and 25 because of the lack of removable partial denture use for eating. The 5-year success rate of 71.3% for the circumferential design did not differ significantly from the 76.6% for the bar design (p > 0.05). There were no discernible changes in the nine periodontal health components of abutment teeth with either of the two designs after 60 months. The results indicate that the two designs do not differ significantly in terms of success rates, maintenance care, and effects on abutment teeth. A well-constructed removable partial denture of either design, supported by favorable abutments and accompanied by a regular recall program offers a satisfactory treatment modality.
进行了一项随机临床试验,以比较两种局部义齿设计的有效性,一种带有I型杆(杆式),另一种带有环形固位体(环形),研究对象为134例患有肯氏I类和II类无牙情况的患者。共有30副局部义齿被视为失败,5例是由于基牙失败,25例是由于未使用可摘局部义齿进食。环形设计的5年成功率为71.3%,与杆式设计的76.6%相比,差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。60个月后,两种设计中的任何一种对基牙的九个牙周健康指标均无明显变化。结果表明,两种设计在成功率、维护护理以及对基牙的影响方面差异均无统计学意义。由良好的基牙支持并伴有定期复查计划的任何一种设计的制作精良的可摘局部义齿,都提供了一种令人满意的治疗方式。