Suárez A, Riestra S, Rodríguez M, Linares A, Otero L, Rodrigo L
Sección de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Covadonga, Oviedo.
Med Clin (Barc). 1994 Jul 9;103(6):209-13.
A comparative study of the differences with respect to prevalence, epidemiologic risk factors, clinical and analytical status and histologic data of blood donors with different liver diseases detected in the same geographical area and time period was carried out.
HBsAg or anti-HCV positive blood donors detected in Asturias (Spain) from October 1989-1991, and a third group of 115 consecutive donors with negative viral markers and an increase in ALT, as well as a fourth control group with no alterations were compared with a BMDP statistical program and logistic regression analysis.
The prevalence of anti-HCV+ donors was greater than that of those with HBsAg+ in both general donors (0.87% vs 0.28%) as well as in new donors (1.77% vs 1.2%) with a constant incidence of HBsAg+ cases of around 0.16% of the donations with a decrease being observed in the anti-HCV+ (ELISA 1) cases from 0.76% to 0.25%. The mean age was significantly higher among the anti-HCV+ donors with respect to the remaining groups (41 vs 36 years). Likewise, the cases of anti-HCV+ presenting parenteral risk factors, such as intravenous drug addiction, transfusion or surgery were significantly higher, with the latter two having an independent predictive value. Signs or symptoms of liver disease were more frequently detected in the anti-HCV+ (10.8%) vs the HBsAg+ (2.3%) as were an increase in ALT (52.8% vs 12.7%) and histologic signs of chronic hepatitis (36.4% vs 6.9%).
Anti-HCV+ blood donors more frequently present previous parenteral risk factors, signs or symptoms of chronic liver disease, hypertransaminasemia or histologic data of chronic hepatitis, thus its detection in al altruistic blood donor indicates a high probability of chronic subjacent liver disease. This is in contrast to donors with HBsAg+ which do not normally present liver disease and those with hypertransaminasemia with negative viral markers who generally have slight liver lesions.
在同一地理区域和时间段内,对检测出患有不同肝脏疾病的献血者的患病率、流行病学危险因素、临床和分析状况以及组织学数据的差异进行了一项比较研究。
采用BMDP统计程序和逻辑回归分析,对1989年10月至1991年在西班牙阿斯图里亚斯检测出的HBsAg或抗-HCV阳性献血者、第三组115名病毒标志物阴性但ALT升高的连续献血者以及第四组无异常的对照组进行比较。
在普通献血者(0.87%对0.28%)和新献血者(1.77%对1.2%)中,抗-HCV+献血者的患病率均高于HBsAg+献血者,HBsAg+病例的发病率恒定,约为献血量的0.16%,而抗-HCV+(ELISA 1)病例从0.76%降至0.25%。抗-HCV+献血者的平均年龄显著高于其他组(41岁对36岁)。同样,有静脉吸毒、输血或手术等非肠道危险因素的抗-HCV+病例显著更高,后两者具有独立的预测价值。抗-HCV+(10.8%)比HBsAg+(2.3%)更频繁地检测到肝脏疾病的体征或症状,ALT升高(52.8%对12.7%)和慢性肝炎的组织学体征(36.4%对6.9%)也是如此。
抗-HCV+献血者更频繁地出现既往非肠道危险因素、慢性肝病的体征或症状、高转氨酶血症或慢性肝炎的组织学数据,因此在所有无偿献血者中检测到抗-HCV+表明潜在慢性肝病的可能性很高。这与通常不患肝病的HBsAg+献血者以及病毒标志物阴性但转氨酶升高的献血者形成对比,后者一般有轻微肝脏病变。