Goldstein R S, Gort E H, Stubbing D, Avendano M A, Guyatt G H
Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Canada.
Lancet. 1994 Nov 19;344(8934):1394-7. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(94)90568-1.
Disability associated with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease has led to the development of rehabilitation programmes that aim to increase exercise tolerance and improve quality of life. Many reports of the benefits of rehabilitation have been from uncontrolled trials and unsupervised programmes. In view of the commitment asked of patients, their families, and health-care professionals, rehabilitation should be justified by a demonstration of sustained improvement over conventional treatment. We undertook a prospective randomised controlled trial of respiratory rehabilitation in 89 subjects (44 men, 45 women) aged 66 (SD 7) years with severe but stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who received rehabilitation or conventional community care. The treatment group were rehabilitated as inpatients for 8 weeks and supervised as outpatients for 16 weeks. Primary outcome measures of exercise tolerance and quality of life were made at baseline and repeated at 12, 18, and 24 weeks. The difference between baseline and last follow-up was significant for 6 min walk distance (37.9 m [95% CI 10.8-65.0], p = 0.0067) and submaximal cycle time (4.7 min [2.1-7.3]). There were also significant differences in questionnaire assessment of dyspnoea (p = 0.0061), emotional function (p = 0.0150), mastery (p = 0.0002), and dyspnoea index (p = 0.0053). Improvements in exercise tolerance and quality of life can be achieved and sustained for 6 months in patients undergoing respiratory rehabilitation compared with those receiving conventional care.
慢性阻塞性肺疾病所致残疾促使了康复计划的开展,这些计划旨在提高运动耐量并改善生活质量。许多关于康复益处的报告都来自非对照试验和无监督的项目。鉴于对患者、其家属和医护人员的要求,康复应以证明比传统治疗有持续改善为依据。我们对89名年龄为66(标准差7)岁、患有严重但稳定的慢性阻塞性肺疾病的受试者(44名男性,45名女性)进行了一项呼吸康复的前瞻性随机对照试验,这些受试者接受了康复治疗或传统社区护理。治疗组作为住院患者进行了8周的康复治疗,并作为门诊患者接受了16周的监督。在基线时测量运动耐量和生活质量的主要结局指标,并在12周、18周和24周重复测量。基线与末次随访之间的差异在6分钟步行距离方面显著(37.9米[95%可信区间10.8 - 65.0],p = 0.0067),在次极量骑行时间方面也显著(4.7分钟[2.1 - 7.3])。在呼吸困难的问卷评估(p = 0.0061)、情绪功能(p = 0.0150)、掌控感(p = 0.0002)和呼吸困难指数(p = 0.0053)方面也存在显著差异。与接受传统护理的患者相比,接受呼吸康复的患者在运动耐量和生活质量方面的改善能够实现并持续6个月。