van Kranen-Mastenbroek V H, Kingma H, Caberg H B, Ghys A, Blanco C E, Hasaart T H, Vles J S
Department of Child Neurology, University Hospital Maastricht, University of Limburg, The Netherlands.
Neuropediatrics. 1994 Jun;25(3):145-53. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1073013.
Quality of spontaneous movements was studied in 15 healthy full-term appropriate for gestational age (AGA) and in 15 full-term small-for gestational age (SGA) newborn infants. All general movements with a minimal duration of 20 seconds were judged on different aspects of movement quality. From the general movements in each group (AGA: n = 106; SGA: n = 187), dominant patterns were isolated. In the AGA Group 3 dominant patterns of general movements were present. In the SGA Group 5 dominant patterns of general movements were found. Three of those were identical to the movement patterns in the AGA group, the remaining two patterns were unique for the SGA infants. Our results indicate that the three different types of general movements which constitute the major part of the normal repertoire of healthy full-term infants can be used as a reference for normal spontaneous motor behaviour. The two different types of general movements in the SGA infants might be used to discriminate between healthy and neurologically suspect newborn infants. The difference in movement pattern between AGA and SGA infants might be explained by the effect of intrauterine malnutrition on CNS development.
对15名足月健康、适于胎龄(AGA)的新生儿和15名足月小于胎龄(SGA)的新生儿的自发运动质量进行了研究。对所有持续时间至少为20秒的一般运动从运动质量的不同方面进行了评判。从每组的一般运动中(AGA组:n = 106;SGA组:n = 187)分离出主导模式。AGA组存在3种一般运动的主导模式。SGA组发现了5种一般运动的主导模式。其中3种与AGA组的运动模式相同,其余两种模式是SGA婴儿所特有的。我们的结果表明,构成健康足月儿正常运动技能主要部分的三种不同类型的一般运动可作为正常自发运动行为的参考。SGA婴儿的两种不同类型的一般运动可用于区分健康新生儿和有神经学疑虑的新生儿。AGA和SGA婴儿之间运动模式的差异可能是由宫内营养不良对中枢神经系统发育的影响所解释的。