Rutstein R P, Fuhr P, Schaafsma D
School of Optometry, University of Alabama at Birmingham.
Optom Vis Sci. 1994 Jul;71(7):415-21. doi: 10.1097/00006324-199407000-00001.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the value of clinical testing of distance stereopsis. Distance stereopsis was assessed with the Mentor Binocular Vision Testing System (B-VAT) system for 45 patients with ocular deviations of 6 delta or more at distance (heterophoria and intermittent strabismus) and for 36 patients with orthophoria. On the average, distance stereopsis was better for patients with the smaller ocular deviations than for those with the larger ocular deviations. The mean distance stereoacuities, both contour and global, for the orthophores were 53 and 81 sec arc, for the heterophores 93 and 100 sec arc, and for the intermittent strabismics 95 and 169 sec arc. Although the average size of the deviation at distance and near for the heterophoric and strabismic patients was nearly the same, distance stereopsis tended to be poorer than near stereopsis. There was a significant difference between the proportion of orthophores and the proportion of intermittent strabismics exhibiting distance stereopsis with both contour and global stereo targets (p < 0.05).
本研究的目的是探讨远距离立体视临床测试的价值。使用Mentor双眼视觉测试系统(B-VAT)对45例远距离斜视度为6棱镜度或更大的眼位偏斜患者(隐斜视和间歇性斜视)以及36例正位视患者进行远距离立体视评估。平均而言,眼位偏斜较小的患者的远距离立体视比眼位偏斜较大的患者更好。正位视患者的平均远距离立体视锐度,轮廓立体视和整体立体视分别为53和81秒弧度,隐斜视患者为93和100秒弧度,间歇性斜视患者为95和169秒弧度。尽管隐斜视和斜视患者远距离和近距离的平均偏斜度大小几乎相同,但远距离立体视往往比近距离立体视差。正位视患者与间歇性斜视患者中,使用轮廓和整体立体视目标均表现出远距离立体视的比例之间存在显著差异(p <0.05)。