Haisfield M E, McGuire D B, Krumm S, Shore A D, Zabora J, Rubin H R
Department of Nursing, Johns Hopkins Oncology Center in Baltimore, MD.
Oncol Nurs Forum. 1994 Aug;21(7):1179-87.
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To gain a better understanding of patients' and healthcare providers' preferences regarding when, how, and by whom advance directive information should be given and to explore the nursing role in advance directives.
A qualitative study using focus group methodology.
A National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer center located within a large, university-affiliated, tertiary care hospital in the northeastern United States.
Two samples participated in the study: eight adult ambulatory patients with cancer and 15 healthcare providers (4 physicians, 10 nurses, and 1 social worker).
Separate patient and provider focus groups were conducted in private rooms by experienced facilitators using an interview guide with questions based on the literature, the hospital's advance directive materials, and the investigators' experience; sessions were audio-taped, transcribed, and analyzed using qualitative data analysis techniques.
Patients and healthcare providers discussed focus group questions and commented that advance directive discussions should be provided early in the treatment or illness, presented in a short and simple format with reading materials at a level appropriate for the patient, and continued throughout the illness with those who desire follow-up. Nurses, doctors, social workers, or a designated/trained advance directive person were individuals that the patients identified as people with whom they could have advance directive discussions.
Results suggested that advance directive information should be given prior to hospital admission, be provided in a variety of formats, and that nurses, social workers, doctors, or designated staff representatives could all be part of the advance directive process.
Nursing roles should include early assessment of patients to determine needs for discussion, advocacy on behalf of patients, and provision of information. Future research should examine use of specific personnel for facilitating advance directives and compare different formats for presenting advance directive information to patients.
目的/目标:更好地了解患者和医疗服务提供者对于预先指示信息应在何时、如何以及由谁提供的偏好,并探讨护理人员在预先指示中的作用。
采用焦点小组方法的定性研究。
位于美国东北部一所大型大学附属三级护理医院内的一家国家癌症研究所指定的综合癌症中心。
两个样本参与了该研究:八名成年癌症门诊患者和15名医疗服务提供者(4名医生、10名护士和1名社会工作者)。
经验丰富的主持人在私人房间分别组织患者和提供者焦点小组,使用基于文献、医院预先指示材料和研究人员经验设计的访谈指南提问;会议进行录音、转录,并使用定性数据分析技术进行分析。
患者和医疗服务提供者讨论了焦点小组问题,并表示预先指示讨论应在治疗或患病早期进行,以简短、简单的形式呈现,并配有适合患者水平的阅读材料,对于希望跟进的患者,在整个患病期间都应持续进行。患者认为护士、医生、社会工作者或指定/受过培训的预先指示负责人是可以与之进行预先指示讨论的人员。
结果表明,预先指示信息应在入院前提供,采用多种形式,并且护士、社会工作者、医生或指定的工作人员代表都可以参与预先指示过程。
护理角色应包括早期评估患者以确定讨论需求、代表患者进行倡导以及提供信息。未来的研究应考察使用特定人员来促进预先指示,并比较向患者呈现预先指示信息的不同形式。