• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Attitudes towards and barriers to writing advance directives amongst cancer patients, healthy controls, and medical staff.癌症患者、健康对照者及医务人员对预先医疗指示的态度和书写障碍。
J Med Ethics. 2005 Aug;31(8):437-40. doi: 10.1136/jme.2004.009605.
2
Patients' and healthcare providers' opinions regarding advance directives.患者及医疗服务提供者对预立医疗指示的看法。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 1994 Aug;21(7):1179-87.
3
Family physicians' attitudes toward advance directives.家庭医生对预立医疗指示的态度。
CMAJ. 1992 Jun 1;146(11):1937-44.
4
Canadian outpatients and advance directives: poor knowledge and little experience but positive attitudes.加拿大门诊患者与预立医疗指示:知识匮乏、经验欠缺但态度积极。
CMAJ. 1993 May 1;148(9):1497-502.
5
Advance directives for medical care--a case for greater use.医疗照护预先指示——扩大使用的理由
N Engl J Med. 1991 Mar 28;324(13):889-95. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199103283241305.
6
Advance directives: the views of health care professionals.预先医疗指示:医护人员的观点
CMAJ. 1993 Apr 15;148(8):1331-8.
7
A preliminary investigation of opinions and behaviors regarding advance directives for medical care.关于医疗预嘱的意见和行为的初步调查。
Am J Crit Care. 1993 Mar;2(2):161-7.
8
[Advance directives in the prehospital setting -- emergency physicians' attitudes].[院前环境中的预立医疗指示——急诊医生的态度]
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2005 Dec;40(12):743-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-921033.
9
Attitudes of physicians, nurses and relatives towards end-of-life decisions concerning nursing home patients with dementia.医生、护士及亲属对患有痴呆症的疗养院患者临终决策的态度。
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Jun;61(3):372-80. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.04.016. Epub 2005 Jun 21.
10
Medical technology at the end of life. What would physicians and nurses want for themselves?临终时的医疗技术。医生和护士希望自己在这种情况下得到什么?
Arch Intern Med. 1993 Nov 22;153(22):2542-7.

引用本文的文献

1
[Opportunities and risks of advance directives : An appraisal of the practice in Germany after legal regulation in 2009].[预立医疗指示的机遇与风险:对2009年法律规制后德国实践情况的评估]
Schmerz. 2025 Apr;39(2):133-140. doi: 10.1007/s00482-023-00771-0. Epub 2024 Jan 2.
2
Attitudes toward End-of-Life Resuscitation: A Psychometric Evaluation of a Novel Attitude Scale.对临终复苏的态度:一种新型态度量表的心理测量评估
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Sep 25;11(19):2618. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11192618.
3
Health Care System Distrust, Race, and Surrogate Decision-Making Regarding Code Status.医疗保健系统中的不信任、种族与关于抢救状态的替代决策
Health Equity. 2022 Oct 27;6(1):809-818. doi: 10.1089/heq.2022.0044. eCollection 2022.
4
Advance Directives in Oncology and Haematology: A Long Way to Go-A Narrative Review.肿瘤学和血液学中的预先医疗指示:任重道远——一篇叙述性综述
J Clin Med. 2022 Feb 23;11(5):1195. doi: 10.3390/jcm11051195.
5
Treatment Limitation Decisions in Critically Ill Patients With a Malignancy on the Intensive Care Unit.危重症癌症患者的治疗限制决策。
J Intensive Care Med. 2021 Jan;36(1):42-50. doi: 10.1177/0885066620948453. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
6
Process evaluation of a complex intervention to promote advance care planning in community-dwelling older persons (the STADPLAN study)-study protocol.一项复杂干预措施以促进社区居住老年人的预先护理计划的过程评估(STADPLAN 研究)-研究方案。
Trials. 2020 Jul 16;21(1):653. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04529-2.
7
Advance directives of lung cancer patients and caregivers in China: A cross sectional survey.中国肺癌患者及其照护者的预先指示:一项横断面调查。
Thorac Cancer. 2020 Feb;11(2):253-263. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.13237. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
8
Illness Understanding and Advance Care Planning in Patients with Advanced Lymphoma.晚期淋巴瘤患者的疾病认知和预先医疗护理计划。
J Palliat Med. 2020 Jun;23(6):832-837. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2019.0311. Epub 2019 Oct 18.
9
Content analysis of Advance Directives completed by patients with advanced cancer as part of an Advance Care Planning intervention: insights gained from the ACTION trial.作为一项预先医疗计划干预的一部分,对晚期癌症患者完成的预先指示的内容分析:从 ACTION 试验中获得的见解。
Support Care Cancer. 2020 Mar;28(3):1513-1522. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-04956-1. Epub 2019 Jul 5.
10
Advance care planning dispositions: the relationship between knowledge and perception.预先医疗照护计划意向:知识与认知之间的关系。
BMC Geriatr. 2019 Apr 24;19(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1113-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Bill clarifies gap in law over living wills.法案澄清了生前遗嘱方面的法律漏洞。
BMJ. 2004 Jun 26;328(7455):1516. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7455.1516-d.
2
Enough. The failure of the living will.够了。生前预嘱的失败。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2004 Mar-Apr;34(2):30-42.
3
[Representative survey of german people concerning enlightenment and patient directive in a case of terminal illness].[关于绝症病例中德国民众对临终关怀与预立医疗指示的代表性调查]
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2002 May;52(5):236-43. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-28526.
4
Palliative care versus euthanasia. The German position: the German General Medical Council's principles for medical care of the terminally ill.姑息治疗与安乐死。德国的立场:德国医学总会关于晚期患者医疗护理的原则
J Med Philos. 2000 Apr;25(2):195-219. doi: 10.1076/0360-5310(200004)25:2;1-O;FT195.
5
Patient preferences for communication with physicians about end-of-life decisions. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preference for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment.患者对于与医生交流临终决策的偏好。支持性治疗研究组。了解预后及对治疗结果和风险的偏好研究。
Ann Intern Med. 1997 Jul 1;127(1):1-12. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-127-1-199707010-00001.
6
Advance directives for seriously ill hospitalized patients: effectiveness with the patient self-determination act and the SUPPORT intervention. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment.重症住院患者的预立医疗指示:《患者自主决定法案》及SUPPORT干预措施的效果。SUPPORT研究人员。了解治疗结果和风险的预后及偏好研究。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997 Apr;45(4):500-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1997.tb05178.x.
7
Pulling the plug on living wills. A critical analysis of advance directives.
Chest. 1996 Sep;110(3):816-22. doi: 10.1378/chest.110.3.816.
8
Advance directives in the medical intensive care unit of a community teaching hospital.
Chest. 1995 Mar;107(3):752-6. doi: 10.1378/chest.107.3.752.
9
The prevalence of advance directives: lessons from a nursing home.预立医疗指示的普及率:来自一家养老院的经验教训。
Nurse Pract. 1995 Feb;20(2):7-8, 13, 17-8, passim.
10
Promoting inpatient directives about life-sustaining treatments in a community hospital. Results of a 3-year time-series intervention trial.在一家社区医院推广关于维持生命治疗的住院医嘱。一项为期3年的时间序列干预试验的结果。
Arch Intern Med. 1995 Nov 27;155(21):2317-23.

癌症患者、健康对照者及医务人员对预先医疗指示的态度和书写障碍。

Attitudes towards and barriers to writing advance directives amongst cancer patients, healthy controls, and medical staff.

作者信息

Sahm S, Will R, Hommel G

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology/Oncology, German Clinic of Diagnosis, Aukammallee 33, 65191 Wiesbaden, Germany.

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 2005 Aug;31(8):437-40. doi: 10.1136/jme.2004.009605.

DOI:10.1136/jme.2004.009605
PMID:16076965
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1734199/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

After years of public discussion too little is still known about willingness to accept the idea of writing an advance directive among various groups of people in EU countries. We investigated knowledge about and willingness to accept such a directive in cancer patients, healthy controls, physicians, and nursing staff in Germany.

METHODS

Cancer patients, healthy controls, nursing staff, and physicians (n = 100 in each group) were surveyed by means of a structured questionnaire.

RESULTS

Only 18% and 19% of the patients and healthy controls respectively, and 10% of the medical staff had written an advance directive. However, 50-81% of those surveyed indicated that they wished to write one. This intention was associated with deteriorating health (p < 0.001). Only 29% of the healthy controls and 43% of the patients knew about the possibility of appointing a health care proxy. A majority in all groups believed that advance directives may influence the course of treatment (79-85%), yet half of those surveyed in all groups fear that patients could be pressurised into writing an advance directive, and 38-65% thought that relatives could abuse such documents.

CONCLUSIONS

Only a minority of the participants had written an advance directive and knew about the possibility of authorizing a health care proxy. Deteriorating health was associated with increasing willingness to make a directive. Despite a majority belief that advance directives may influence treatment at the end of life, other factors limit their employment, such as fear of abuse.

摘要

目的

经过多年的公众讨论,对于欧盟国家不同人群接受生前预嘱这一想法的意愿,我们仍知之甚少。我们调查了德国癌症患者、健康对照者、医生和护理人员对生前预嘱的了解程度及接受意愿。

方法

通过结构化问卷对癌症患者、健康对照者、护理人员和医生(每组100人)进行调查。

结果

分别只有18%的患者和19%的健康对照者以及10%的医务人员撰写了生前预嘱。然而,50%-81%的被调查者表示他们希望撰写一份。这种意愿与健康状况恶化相关(p<0.001)。只有29%的健康对照者和43%的患者知道可以指定医疗代理人。所有组中的大多数人认为生前预嘱可能会影响治疗过程(79%-85%),然而所有组中一半的被调查者担心患者可能会被迫撰写生前预嘱,38%-65%的人认为亲属可能会滥用此类文件。

结论

只有少数参与者撰写了生前预嘱并知道可以授权医疗代理人。健康状况恶化与制定生前预嘱的意愿增加相关。尽管大多数人认为生前预嘱可能会影响临终治疗,但其他因素限制了它们的应用,例如担心被滥用。