Cavalier-Smith T, Allsopp M T, Chao E E
Canadian Institute for Advanced Research Evolutionary Biology Program, Department of Botany, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Nov 22;91(24):11368-72. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.24.11368.
All algae with chloroplasts located not freely in the cytosol, but inside two extra membranes, probably arose chimerically by the permanent fusion of two different eukaryote cells: a protozoan host and a eukaryotic algal symbiont. Two such groups, cryptomonads (phylum Cryptista) and Chlorarachniophyta, still retain a DNA-containing relic of the nucleus of the algal endosymbiont, known as the nucleomorph, as well as the host nucleus. These two phyla were traditionally assumed to have obtained their chloroplasts separately by two independent symbioses. We have sequenced the nuclear and the nucleomorph 18S rRNA genes of the nonphotosynthetic cryptomonad Chilomonas paramecium. Our phylogenetic analysis suggests that cryptomonad and chlorarachniophyte nucleomorphs may be related to each other and raises the possibility that both phyla may have diverged from a common ancestral chimeric cell that originated by a single endosymbiosis involving an algal endosymbiont related to the ancestor of red algae. But, because of the instability of the molecular trees when different taxa are added, there is insufficient evidence to overturn the traditional view that Chlorarachnion nucleomorphs evolved separately from a relative of green algae. The four phyla that contain chromophyte algae (those with chlorophyll c--i.e., Cryptista, Heterokonta, Haptophyta, Dinozoa) are distantly related to each other and to Chlorarachniophyta on our trees. However, all of the photosynthetic taxa within each of these four phyla radiate from each other very substantially after the radiation of the four phyla themselves. This favors the view that the common ancestor of these four phyla was not photosynthetic and that chloroplasts were implanted separately into each much more recently. This probable polyphyly of the chromophyte algae, if confirmed, would make it desirable to treat Cryptista, Heterokonta, and Haptophyta as separate kingdoms, rather than to group them together in the single kingdom Chromista.
所有叶绿体并非自由存在于细胞质中,而是位于两层额外膜内的藻类,可能是由两种不同真核细胞的永久融合嵌合产生的:一个原生动物宿主和一个真核藻类共生体。有两个这样的类群,隐藻(隐藻门)和绿藻虫纲,仍然保留着藻类内共生体细胞核的含DNA遗迹,称为核质体,以及宿主细胞核。传统上认为这两个门是通过两次独立的共生分别获得叶绿体的。我们对非光合隐藻草履虫的细胞核和核质体18S rRNA基因进行了测序。我们的系统发育分析表明,隐藻和绿藻虫纲的核质体可能彼此相关,并增加了这两个门可能从一个共同的祖先嵌合细胞分化而来的可能性,这个祖先嵌合细胞起源于一次涉及与红藻祖先相关的藻类内共生体的内共生事件。但是,由于添加不同分类群时分子树的不稳定性,没有足够的证据推翻传统观点,即绿藻虫纲的核质体是从绿藻的一个亲缘物种独立进化而来的。在我们的树上,包含色素体藻类(那些含有叶绿素c的藻类——即隐藻门、不等鞭毛类、定鞭藻门、双鞭毛虫门)的四个门彼此之间以及与绿藻虫纲的关系都很疏远。然而,在这四个门自身分化之后,这四个门中每个门内的所有光合分类群都有非常大的分化。这支持了这样一种观点,即这四个门的共同祖先不是光合的,并且叶绿体是在更近的时期分别植入每个门中的。色素体藻类这种可能的多系起源,如果得到证实,将使得把隐藻门、不等鞭毛类和定鞭藻门作为独立的界来对待,而不是将它们归为色藻界这一个单一的界。