• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

布拉登量表对养老院人群压疮风险的预测效度。

Predictive validity of the Braden Scale for pressure sore risk in a nursing home population.

作者信息

Braden B J, Bergstrom N

机构信息

School of Nursing, Creighton University, Omaha, NE 68178.

出版信息

Res Nurs Health. 1994 Dec;17(6):459-70. doi: 10.1002/nur.4770170609.

DOI:10.1002/nur.4770170609
PMID:7972924
Abstract

The predictive validity of the Braden Scale and the timing of assessment for optimal prediction of pressure sore development (PS) were studied in a nursing home population. Subjects (N = 102) over age 19, free of PS and admitted within the previous 72 hr, were randomly selected from consecutive admissions to a skilled nursing facility. Subjects were assessed for risk and skin condition every 48 to 72 hr for 4 weeks. Twenty-eight subjects (27.5%) developed a PS. A cut score of 18 used at the observation prior to the first recorded PS maximized prediction, producing a sensitivity of 79%, a specificity of 74%, a 54% predictive value of a positive test, 90% predictive value of a negative test, and 75% correct classification rate.

摘要

在养老院人群中研究了Braden量表的预测效度以及为最佳预测压疮发生(PS)而进行评估的时机。从一家专业护理机构的连续入院患者中随机选取了19岁以上、无压疮且在过去72小时内入院的102名受试者。在4周内,每48至72小时对受试者进行一次风险和皮肤状况评估。28名受试者(27.5%)发生了压疮。在首次记录压疮之前的观察中使用的18分的临界值可使预测最大化,其敏感性为79%,特异性为74%,阳性试验预测值为54%,阴性试验预测值为90%,正确分类率为75%。

相似文献

1
Predictive validity of the Braden Scale for pressure sore risk in a nursing home population.布拉登量表对养老院人群压疮风险的预测效度。
Res Nurs Health. 1994 Dec;17(6):459-70. doi: 10.1002/nur.4770170609.
2
A clinical trial of the Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk.用于预测压疮风险的Braden量表的一项临床试验。
Nurs Clin North Am. 1987 Jun;22(2):417-28.
3
Predicting pressure ulcer risk: a multisite study of the predictive validity of the Braden Scale.预测压疮风险:一项关于Braden量表预测效度的多中心研究。
Nurs Res. 1998 Sep-Oct;47(5):261-9. doi: 10.1097/00006199-199809000-00005.
4
Predicting pressure ulcer risk with the modified Braden, Braden, and Norton scales in acute care hospitals in Mainland China.在中国内地的急症医院中,使用改良版Braden量表、Braden量表和Norton量表预测压疮风险。
Appl Nurs Res. 2005 May;18(2):122-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2005.01.001.
5
Predictive validity of the Braden Scale for Pressure Ulcer Risk in elderly residents of long-term care facilities.Braden 压疮风险评估量表对长期护理机构老年居民的预测效度。
Geriatr Nurs. 2010 Mar-Apr;31(2):95-104. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2009.11.010.
6
A Meta-analysis to Evaluate the Predictive Validity of the Braden Scale for Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment in Long-term Care.一项评估Braden量表在长期护理中压疮风险评估预测效度的Meta分析。
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2016 Sep;62(9):20-8.
7
Predicting pressure sore risk with the Norton, Braden, and Waterlow scales in a Hong Kong rehabilitation hospital.在香港一家康复医院使用诺顿量表、布拉德恩量表和沃特洛量表预测压疮风险。
Nurs Res. 1998 May-Jun;47(3):147-53. doi: 10.1097/00006199-199805000-00005.
8
Predictive validity of the Braden Scale and nurse perception in identifying pressure ulcer risk.Braden量表的预测效度及护士对压疮风险识别的认知
Appl Nurs Res. 1996 May;9(2):80-6. doi: 10.1016/s0897-1897(96)80457-5.
9
Assessing predictive validity of the modified Braden scale for prediction of pressure ulcer risk of orthopaedic patients in an acute care setting.评估改良版Braden量表在急性护理环境中对骨科患者压疮风险预测的预测效度。
J Clin Nurs. 2009 Jun;18(11):1565-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02757.x.
10
A prospective study of pressure sore risk among institutionalized elderly.一项关于机构养老老年人压疮风险的前瞻性研究。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1992 Aug;40(8):747-58. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1992.tb01845.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Predicting pressure injury risk in hospitalised patients using machine learning with electronic health records: a US multilevel cohort study.利用电子健康记录的机器学习预测住院患者的压疮风险:一项美国多层次队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Apr 9;14(4):e082540. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082540.
2
Nutritional interventions for preventing and treating pressure ulcers.营养干预预防和治疗压疮。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Feb 12;2(2):CD003216. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003216.pub3.
3
Nursing Assessment of Pressure Injury Risk with the Braden Scale Validated against Sensor-Based Measurement of Movement.
采用基于传感器的运动测量法验证的Braden量表对压力性损伤风险进行护理评估。
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Nov 21;10(11):2330. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10112330.
4
Prophylaxis of occipital pressure sores in patients after elective spinal surgery in a pandemic condition.大流行情况下择期脊柱手术后患者枕部压疮的预防
Reumatologia. 2022;60(2):153-160. doi: 10.5114/reum.2022.116198. Epub 2022 May 18.
5
Evaluating the impact of using a wound-specific oral nutritional supplement to support wound healing in a rehabilitation setting.评估在康复环境中使用伤口专用口服营养补充剂支持伤口愈合的效果。
Int Wound J. 2023 Jan;20(1):145-154. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13849. Epub 2022 Jun 9.
6
Predictive validity of the braden scale for pressure injury risk assessment in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Braden 量表评估成人压力性损伤风险的预测效度:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Nurs Open. 2021 Sep;8(5):2194-2207. doi: 10.1002/nop2.792. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
7
Increased risk of hospital-acquired foot ulcers in people with diabetes: large prospective study and implications for practice.糖尿病患者医院获得性足部溃疡风险增加:大型前瞻性研究及对实践的启示
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2018 Jul 9;6(1):e000510. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2018-000510. eCollection 2018.
8
Nursing documentation of pressure ulcers in nursing homes: comparison of record content and patient examinations.养老院中压疮的护理记录:记录内容与患者检查的比较
Nurs Open. 2016 Mar 7;3(3):159-167. doi: 10.1002/nop2.47. eCollection 2016 Jul.
9
Nutritional interventions for preventing and treating pressure ulcers.预防和治疗压疮的营养干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jun 12;2014(6):CD003216. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003216.pub2.
10
The incidence and determinants of decubitus ulcers in hospital care: an analysis of routine quality management data at a university hospital.医院护理中压疮的发生率和决定因素:对某大学附属医院常规质量管理数据的分析。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2013 Aug;110(33-34):550-6. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2013.0550. Epub 2013 Aug 19.