• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Mini-lap cholecystectomy--an attractive alternative to conventional cholecystectomy.

作者信息

Seenu V, Misra M C

机构信息

All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi.

出版信息

Trop Gastroenterol. 1994 Jan-Mar;15(1):29-31.

PMID:7974754
Abstract

A prospective study was conducted to determine the safety and efficacy of cholecystectomy through a 5 cm transverse abdominal incision. 181 consecutive patients who underwent elective cholecystectomy for symptomatic gall stone disease in a single surgical unit at the All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi between December 1990 to February 1992, were prospectively randomized into 5 cm transverse and midline incision groups. Operative time, blood loss, post-operative stay and complications were compared in the two groups. Ninety seven patients were included in the transverse incision group and 84 patients in the midline group. Cholecystectomy could be safely performed through a 5 cm transverse incision in 84 patients (86.8%) without increase in operative complications, morbidity or mortality. In another 84 patients cholecystectomy was performed through a midline incision. The average operating time and blood loss were comparable in both groups. The average post-operative stay in 5 cm transverse incision group was 2.6 days (range 1-4 days) and in the midline group was 4.0 days (range 3-5 days). There were 7 post-operative complications (all wound infections) in the 5 cm transverse group and 12 post-operative complications (10 wound infections and 2 pneumonitis) in the midline group. However, the difference in wound infection rate was not statistically significant (p > 0.1). In Conclusion, Cholecystectomy can be safely performed through a 5 cm transverse incision.

摘要

相似文献

1
Mini-lap cholecystectomy--an attractive alternative to conventional cholecystectomy.
Trop Gastroenterol. 1994 Jan-Mar;15(1):29-31.
2
Cholecystectomy with and without drainage: a prospective randomised study.胆囊切除术伴与不伴引流:一项前瞻性随机研究。
East Afr Med J. 1993 Aug;70(8):499-501.
3
Mini-cholecystectomy: a feasible option.迷你胆囊切除术:一种可行的选择。
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2010 Jul-Sep;22(3):68-70.
4
Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy in cirrhotic patients: a prospective study.肝硬化患者腹腔镜与开腹胆囊切除术的前瞻性研究
Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1997 Dec;7(6):483-6.
5
[Transverse minilaparotomy as an access route in right colon disease: a valid alternative to midline laparotomy].[经腹横小切口作为右半结肠疾病的手术入路:中线剖腹术的有效替代方案]
Chir Ital. 2000 Jan-Feb;52(1):91-6.
6
Comparison between midline and right transverse incision in right hemicolectomy for right-sided colon cancer: a retrospective study.右侧结肠癌右半结肠切除术中中线切口与右横切口的比较:一项回顾性研究
J Med Assoc Thai. 2009 Aug;92(8):1003-8.
7
Randomized clinical trial of conventional cholecystectomy versus minicholecystectomy.传统胆囊切除术与迷你胆囊切除术的随机临床试验
Br J Surg. 1997 Dec;84(12):1683-6.
8
Evaluation of the role of prophylactic antibiotics in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized trial.预防性抗生素在择期腹腔镜胆囊切除术中作用的评估:一项前瞻性随机试验。
Trop Gastroenterol. 2006 Jan-Mar;27(1):54-7.
9
Randomized clinical trial of diathermy versus scalpel incision in elective midline laparotomy.择期正中剖腹手术中透热疗法与手术刀切口的随机临床试验。
Br J Surg. 2001 Jan;88(1):41-4. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2001.01625.x.
10
Mini-laparotomy for repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm.用于修复肾下腹主动脉瘤的小型剖腹术。
Int Angiol. 2005 Sep;24(3):238-44.

引用本文的文献

1
Added value of surgical interdisciplinarity- The Joel-Cohen's abdominal incision.手术跨学科的附加值——乔尔-科恩腹部切口
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Jun 1;67:102455. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102455. eCollection 2021 Jul.
2
Laparoscopic versus small-incision cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis.有症状胆囊结石患者的腹腔镜与小切口胆囊切除术对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Oct 18;2006(4):CD006229. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006229.
3
Small-incision versus open cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis.
有症状胆囊结石患者的小切口与开腹胆囊切除术对比研究
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Oct 18;2006(4):CD004788. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004788.pub2.
4
Transverse verses midline incisions for abdominal surgery.腹部手术的横向切口与中线切口。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Oct 19;2005(4):CD005199. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005199.pub2.