Pedersen B, Nielsen A F, Lauritsen J G
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aalborg Hospital, Denmark.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1994 Oct;73(9):701-5. doi: 10.3109/00016349409029407.
To examine sperm donors' motivations and emotional reactions to the role of donors and to measure their willingness to provide information about themselves to recipients and offspring.
A prospective trial in which the 26 subjects who were actively functioning as sperm donors in our fertility clinic at the time of investigation were asked to fill in a questionnaire and return it anonymously and voluntarily.
8% of the donors stated purely altruistic motivation, 32% purely financial and 60% a combination of both. The acceptance rate for providing non-identifying, phenotypic, descriptive information to recipients is 76%, for providing medical information it is 60% and the provision of psychosocial information is accepted by 28% to 40%, depending on the item. 20% of donors are willing to continue donation if the present rules of anonymity are revoked.
Most donors do not seem to feel any close relationship to donor offspring and at least 60% found anonymity to be essential for their further functioning as donors.
探讨精子捐赠者成为捐赠者的动机和情感反应，并衡量他们向受赠者及后代提供自身信息的意愿。
一项前瞻性试验，在调查时，要求正在我们生育诊所积极担任精子捐赠者的26名受试者填写一份问卷，并匿名且自愿返还。
8%的捐赠者表示纯粹出于利他动机，32%纯粹为了金钱，60%是两者兼有。向受赠者提供非识别性、表型、描述性信息的接受率为76%，提供医疗信息的接受率为60%，提供心理社会信息的接受率为28%至40%，具体取决于项目。如果现行匿名规则被撤销，20%的捐赠者愿意继续捐赠。
大多数捐赠者似乎并不觉得与捐赠后代有任何密切关系，至少60%的人认为匿名对于他们继续担任捐赠者至关重要。
