Suppr超能文献

作为叛逆者的经验主义者:荣格、弗洛伊德与门徒的负担。

The empiricist as rebel: Jung, Freud, and the burdens of discipleship.

作者信息

Stepansky P E

出版信息

J Hist Behav Sci. 1976 Jul;12(3):216-39. doi: 10.1002/1520-6696(197607)12:3<216::aid-jhbs2300120303>3.0.co;2-5.

Abstract

However little they share in common, both Freudian and Jungian commentators have long agreed that Jung's theoretical development in the years following his psychoanalytic affiliation prompted an open "split" with Freud and the psychoanalytic movement. Careful examination of Jung's principal "rebel" works does not sustain this thesis, however, but rather indicates Jung's honest belief that his limited appropriation of certain psychoanalytic mechanisms and attendant theoretical modifications constituted full-fledged loyalty to psychoanalysis as he understood it. This perception receives significant support from the Freud-Jung correspondence which reveals Jung openly articulating the ground rules defining his loyalty to psychoanalysis as early as 1906, and Freud accepting, and even approving, his protégé's empirical reservations over the course of the next five years.

摘要

尽管弗洛伊德派和荣格派的评论家们共同点很少,但长期以来他们都一致认为,荣格在与精神分析学派建立联系后的几年里,其理论发展促使他与弗洛伊德及精神分析运动公开“决裂”。然而,仔细研究荣格主要的“反叛”作品后发现,这一论点并不成立,反而表明荣格真诚地认为,他对某些精神分析机制的有限运用以及随之而来的理论修正,在他看来构成了对精神分析的完全忠诚。这一观点在弗洛伊德与荣格的通信中得到了有力支持,这些通信显示,早在1906年,荣格就公开阐明了界定他对精神分析忠诚的基本规则,而在接下来的五年里,弗洛伊德接受了,甚至认可了他这位门徒基于经验的保留意见。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验