Suppr超能文献

通过声学定量法测量左心室射血分数并与放射性核素血管造影术进行比较。

Measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction by acoustic quantification and comparison with radionuclide angiography.

作者信息

Yvorchuk K J, Davies R A, Chan K L

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 1994 Nov 15;74(10):1052-6. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(94)90858-3.

Abstract

Left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) is an important measure of systolic function, with radionuclide angiography being the accepted standard for its determination. Echocardiography is ideal for repeated measurements of EF, but most methods are either subject to error in the presence of regional wall abnormalities or require cumbersome off-line analysis. Acoustic quantification is a recently introduced method that allows for the continuous on-line display of LV cavity dimensions, but the on-line algorithm for the measurement of EF has not been validated against an independent standard in the clinical setting. This study attempted to validate acoustic quantification in the determination of EF by comparison with off-line echocardiographic analysis and radionuclide angiography in 54 patients referred for this latter procedure. Acoustic quantification correlated well with off-line analysis in both the apical 4-chamber (r = 0.89, n = 43) and 2-chamber (r = 0.86, n = 26) views. Similarly, it also correlated well with radionuclide angiography in the 4-chamber (r = 0.81, n = 44) and 2-chamber (r = 0.83, n = 26) views. The correlation between the 2 methods was further improved when only the last 30 patients were assessed (r = 0.91, n = 25 for 4-chamber views; r = 0.86, n = 16 for 2-chamber views). The correlation was worse in patients with regional asynergy (r = 0.69, n = 17 for 4-chamber views; r = 0.76, n = 10 for 2-chamber views). Moreover, acoustic quantification tended to underestimate EF when compared with radionuclide angiography.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

左心室(LV)射血分数(EF)是收缩功能的一项重要指标,放射性核素血管造影是测定该指标的公认标准。超声心动图非常适合对EF进行重复测量,但大多数方法在存在局部室壁异常时容易出现误差,或者需要繁琐的离线分析。声学定量是一种最近引入的方法,可实现左心室腔尺寸的连续在线显示,但用于测量EF的在线算法在临床环境中尚未根据独立标准进行验证。本研究试图通过将54例因后者检查而转诊的患者的声学定量与离线超声心动图分析和放射性核素血管造影进行比较,来验证声学定量在EF测定中的有效性。声学定量在心尖四腔心(r = 0.89,n = 43)和两腔心(r = 0.86,n = 26)视图中与离线分析均具有良好的相关性。同样,在四腔心(r = 0.81,n = 44)和两腔心(r = 0.83,n = 26)视图中,它与放射性核素血管造影也具有良好的相关性。仅评估最后30例患者时,两种方法之间的相关性进一步提高(四腔心视图:r = 0.91,n = 25;两腔心视图:r = 0.86,n = 16)。在存在局部运动不协调的患者中,相关性较差(四腔心视图:r = 0.69,n = 17;两腔心视图:r = 0.76,n = 10)。此外,与放射性核素血管造影相比,声学定量往往会低估EF。(摘要截短于250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验