Suppr超能文献

用氧化锌-聚乙烯基水门汀粘结的正畸托槽的剪切粘结强度。

Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets cemented with a zinc oxide-polyvinyl cement.

作者信息

Martin S, Garcia-Godoy F

机构信息

University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio.

出版信息

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1994 Dec;106(6):615-20. doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(94)70086-9.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the shear bond strengths and enamel surface structure after debonding a conventional metal bracket and a polycrystalline ceramic bracket bonded with a bipolar zinc oxide-polyvinyl cement (F-21) or a light-cured resin cement (Transbond). Forty extracted human premolars were used. The buccal enamel surfaces were used, and the teeth randomly divided into four groups of 10 teeth each: group 1: conventional metal bracket (Unitek) bonded with Transbond; group 2: metal bracket bonded with F-21; group 3: ceramic bracket (Transcend 2000) bonded with Transbond; and group 4: ceramic bracket bonded with F-21. The brackets were bonded to the etched enamel surfaces according to manufacturer's instructions. All specimens were stored in distilled water for 24 hours and then thermocycled for 300 cycles between 5 degrees C and 55 degrees C. The specimens were mounted in dental stone and placed in the Instron at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min with a knife-edged blade. Immediately after debonding, the enamel surface and bracket-enamel interface were evaluated visually and with a stereomicroscope. Representative samples were then examined with the scanning electron microscope. The analysis of variance and Student-Newman-Keuls tests were performed. The results in megapascals were Group 1: 19,6 (+/- 9,6); group 2: 14,3 (+/- 4,6); group 3: 28,8 (+/- 12,6); and group 4: 18,5 (+/- 7,5). Group 3 was statistically significantly different (P < 0.008) from all other groups. Groups 1, 2, and 4 were not significantly different.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

本研究的目的是比较使用双极氧化锌-聚乙烯基水门汀(F-21)或光固化树脂水门汀(Transbond)粘结的传统金属托槽和多晶陶瓷托槽脱粘后的剪切粘结强度及釉质表面结构。使用了40颗拔除的人类前磨牙。使用颊侧釉质表面,将牙齿随机分为四组,每组10颗牙:第1组:用Transbond粘结的传统金属托槽(Unitek);第2组:用F-21粘结的金属托槽;第3组:用Transbond粘结的陶瓷托槽(Transcend 2000);第4组:用F-21粘结的陶瓷托槽。按照制造商的说明将托槽粘结到酸蚀后的釉质表面。所有标本在蒸馏水中储存24小时,然后在5℃至55℃之间进行300次热循环。将标本安装在牙科石膏中,并以0.5mm/min的十字头速度用刀刃刀片放置在Instron试验机上。脱粘后立即用肉眼和立体显微镜评估釉质表面和托槽-釉质界面。然后用扫描电子显微镜检查代表性样本。进行方差分析和Student-Newman-Keuls检验。结果以兆帕计:第1组:19.6(±9.6);第2组:14.3(±4.6);第3组:28.8(±12.6);第4组:18.5(±7.5)。第3组与所有其他组在统计学上有显著差异(P<0.008)。第1、第2和第4组无显著差异。(摘要截断于250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验