Suppr超能文献

粘结于酸蚀或未酸蚀牙釉质上的陶瓷托槽的抗剪强度。

Shear strength of ceramic brackets bonded to etched or unetched enamel.

作者信息

Garcia-Godoy F, Martin S

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Dentistry, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, Texas 78284-7888, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Pediatr Dent. 1995 Spring;19(3):181-3.

PMID:8611486
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the shear bond strengths and enamel surface morphology after debonding a polycrystalline ceramic bracket (Transcend 2000) bonded with a light-cured resin cement (Transbond) without enamel etching or by etching for 15 seconds with 10% or 37% phosphoric acid and 10% maleic acid. Forty extracted noncarious human premolars were used. The buccal enamel surfaces were used and the teeth randomly divided in to four groups of 10 teeth each: Group 1: No enamel etching; Group 2: Enamel etching for 15 seconds with 10% phosphoric acid; Group 3: Enamel etching for 15 seconds with 37% phosphoric acid; and Group 4: Enamel etching for 15 seconds with 10% maleic acid. The brackets were bonded to the etched enamel surfaces according to manufacturers' instructions except the etching time variations. All specimens were stored in distilled water for 24 hours and then thermocycled for 300 cycles between 5 degrees C and 55 degrees C. The specimens were mounted in dental stone and placed in the Instron at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min using a knife-edged blade. Immediately after debonding, the enamel surface and bracket-enamel interface were evaluated visually and with a stereomicroscope. Representative samples were then examined with the SEM. ANOVA and Student-Newman-Keuls tests were performed. The results (in MPa) were: Group 1:11.83 (+3.9); Group 2: 28.80 (+12.6); Group 3: 26.25 (+5.3); Group 4: 18.06 (+6.9). Groups 2 and 3 were statistically significantly different (p<0.0001) from Groups 1 and 4. Groups 2 vs. 3 or 1 vs. 4 were not statistically different. Debonding occurred mainly at the bracket-resin interface in all groups, except Group 2 which displayed two samples with enamel cohesive failures and two fracturing the bracket. The SEM evaluation revealed that after debonding, the group etched with the 37% phosphoric acid gel had the roughest enamel surface and was the only group to present enamel fractures. Bracket bonding with unetched enamel and enamel etched with 10% phosphoric acid gel should be clinically investigated using the products tested.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较在不进行釉质酸蚀或分别用10%、37%磷酸以及10%马来酸进行15秒酸蚀后,使用光固化树脂水门汀(Transbond)粘结的多晶陶瓷托槽(Transcend 2000)脱粘后的剪切粘结强度和釉质表面形态。使用了40颗拔除的无龋人类前磨牙。使用颊侧釉质表面,将牙齿随机分为四组,每组10颗牙齿:第1组:不进行釉质酸蚀;第2组:用10%磷酸进行15秒釉质酸蚀;第3组:用37%磷酸进行15秒釉质酸蚀;第4组:用10%马来酸进行15秒釉质酸蚀。除酸蚀时间不同外,按照制造商说明将托槽粘结到酸蚀后的釉质表面。所有标本在蒸馏水中储存24小时,然后在5℃至55℃之间进行300次热循环。将标本安装在牙科石膏中,并使用刀口刀片以0.5mm/min的十字头速度放置在Instron试验机中。脱粘后,立即用肉眼和立体显微镜评估釉质表面和托槽 - 釉质界面。然后用扫描电子显微镜检查代表性样本。进行方差分析和Student - Newman - Keuls检验。结果(单位:MPa)为:第1组:11.83(±3.9);第2组:28.80(±12.6);第3组:26.25(±5.3);第4组:18.06(±6.9)。第2组和第3组与第1组和第4组在统计学上有显著差异(p<0.0001)。第2组与第3组或第1组与第4组在统计学上无差异。除第2组有两个样本出现釉质粘结性破坏和两个样本托槽断裂外,所有组的脱粘主要发生在托槽 - 树脂界面。扫描电子显微镜评估显示,脱粘后,用37%磷酸凝胶酸蚀的组釉质表面最粗糙,且是唯一出现釉质骨折的组。临床上应使用测试产品对未酸蚀釉质和用10%磷酸凝胶酸蚀釉质的托槽粘结情况进行研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验