Cappell M S, Shetty V
Department of Medicine, UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson (formerly Rutgers) Medical School, New Brunswick.
Am J Gastroenterol. 1994 Dec;89(12):2172-7.
To analyze the clinical presentation and etiology of ascites in HIV seropositive patients compared with the general population and to analyze the safety and clinical efficacy of abdominal paracentesis in HIV patients.
We did a multiyear study of 24 HIV seropositive and 60 control patients with ascites undergoing diagnostic abdominal paracentesis at two university hospitals.
HIV seropositive patients presented with similar clinical findings as other patients with ascites, except HIV patients had a significantly higher incidence of pyrexia and a lower serum albumin level and leukocyte count. The two groups had similar mean ascitic fluid values of lactate dehydrogenase, total protein, glucose, and erythrocyte count. HIV patients had a trend of a higher rate of infected ascites than controls (29% vs 12%; odds ratio = 3.12; odds ratio confidence interval = 0.80-12.3; p < 0.06; chi 2). HIV and control patients with culture-proven bacterial peritonitis had similar ascitic fluid leukocyte and absolute neutrophil counts. In eight (33%) of the HIV patients, major new diagnoses were made from ascitic fluid analysis, including spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in four, tuberculous ascites in two, fungal peritonitis in one, and lymphoma in one (control rate = 30%; not significantly different; chi 2). The HIV patients did not experience any complications from paracentesis, whereas the controls experienced one minor complication of prolonged drainage of ascitic fluid from the paracentesis site (not significantly different rates; Fisher's exact test). Six (25%) of the HIV patients had ascites caused by AIDS-defining illnesses of lymphoma, peritoneal tuberculosis, or disseminated candidiasis.
Abdominal paracentesis is a safe and effective clinical diagnostic tool in HIV patients. In addition to standard tests, ascitic fluid should be sent for mycobacterial and mycological histological stains and cultures in HIV patients. AIDS-unrelated causes are the most common cause of ascites in HIV patients, with only about 1/4 of cases due to AIDS-related diseases.
分析HIV血清阳性患者腹水的临床表现及病因,并与普通人群进行比较,同时分析HIV患者腹腔穿刺术的安全性及临床疗效。
我们在两家大学医院对24例HIV血清阳性腹水患者及60例对照腹水患者进行了为期多年的研究,所有患者均接受诊断性腹腔穿刺术。
HIV血清阳性患者与其他腹水患者的临床表现相似,但HIV患者发热发生率显著更高,血清白蛋白水平及白细胞计数更低。两组患者腹水的乳酸脱氢酶、总蛋白、葡萄糖及红细胞计数均值相似。HIV患者腹水感染率有高于对照组的趋势(29% 对12%;优势比 = 3.12;优势比置信区间 = 0.80 - 12.3;p < 0.06;卡方检验)。培养证实为细菌性腹膜炎的HIV患者与对照患者腹水白细胞及绝对中性粒细胞计数相似。在8例(33%)HIV患者中,通过腹水分析做出了主要的新诊断,包括4例自发性细菌性腹膜炎、2例结核性腹水、1例真菌性腹膜炎及1例淋巴瘤(对照率 = 30%;无显著差异;卡方检验)。HIV患者腹腔穿刺术未出现任何并发症,而对照组出现了1例腹腔穿刺部位腹水引流时间延长的轻微并发症(发生率无显著差异;Fisher精确检验)。6例(25%)HIV患者的腹水由淋巴瘤、腹膜结核或播散性念珠菌病等艾滋病定义疾病引起。
腹腔穿刺术是HIV患者安全有效的临床诊断工具。除标准检查外,HIV患者的腹水应送检进行分枝杆菌及真菌组织学染色和培养。与艾滋病无关的病因是HIV患者腹水最常见的原因,仅约1/4的病例由艾滋病相关疾病引起。