Nee P A, Picton A J, Ralston D R, Perks A G
Department of Emergency Medicine, University Hospital of South Manchester, England.
Ann Emerg Med. 1994 Nov;24(5):944-6. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(94)70211-x.
To evaluate two methods of augmenting venous filling as potential aids to i.v. cannulation.
Comparative study of cross-sectional areas of preselected antecubital fossa veins.
Vascular laboratory of a British university teaching hospital.
Thirty healthy, normotensive, adult volunteers.
Vessel cross-sectional areas measured noninvasively using a color flow duplex ultrasound scanner. Measurements were taken at rest, after application of a venous tourniquet, with tourniquet and Esmarch bandage, and with tourniquet and Rhys-Davies exsanguinator.
Mean (+/- SD) cross-sectional area at rest was 0.18 +/- 0.094 cm2 and after tourniquet was 0.28 +/- 0.14 cm2. Application of an Esmarch bandage produced an increase to 0.33 +/- 0.14 cm2, and Rhys-Davies exsanguinator produced an increase to 0.32 +/- 0.15 cm2 (P < .0001 for all comparisons except Rhys-Davies exsanguinator versus Esmarch bandage).
Application of either the Esmarch bandage or the Rhys-Davies exsanguinator caused significant filling of antecubital fossa veins in excess of that produced by a venous tourniquet alone in normovolemic, normotensive volunteers.
评估两种增加静脉充盈的方法作为静脉插管潜在辅助手段的效果。
对预先选定的肘前窝静脉横截面积进行比较研究。
英国一所大学教学医院的血管实验室。
30名健康、血压正常的成年志愿者。
使用彩色血流双功超声扫描仪无创测量血管横截面积。测量在静息状态下、应用静脉止血带后、应用止血带和埃斯马赫绷带后以及应用止血带和里斯 - 戴维斯放血器后进行。
静息时平均(±标准差)横截面积为0.18±0.094平方厘米,应用止血带后为0.28±0.14平方厘米。应用埃斯马赫绷带后增加到0.33±0.14平方厘米,应用里斯 - 戴维斯放血器后增加到0.32±0.15平方厘米(除里斯 - 戴维斯放血器与埃斯马赫绷带比较外,所有比较的P <.0001)。
在血容量正常、血压正常的志愿者中,应用埃斯马赫绷带或里斯 - 戴维斯放血器均可使肘前窝静脉显著充盈,且充盈程度超过单独使用静脉止血带时。