Williams J A, Treacy P J, Sidey P, Worthley C S, Townsend N C, Russell E A
Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgical Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Australia.
Aust N Z J Surg. 1994 Dec;64(12):823-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1994.tb04556.x.
T-tube drainage of the common bile duct (CBD) following duct exploration has become standard surgical practice. This randomized prospective study has compared primary closure versus T-tube drainage of the CBD following exploration for calculous disease. Thirty-seven patients underwent primary closure and 26 underwent closure over T-tube. Both groups were comparable in terms of age, indications for surgery, associated illnesses, pre-operative bilirubin, amylase and white cell count. Forty-three per cent of operations were performed by a consultant in the primary closure group and 65% in the T-tube group. There was no significant difference in the duration of operation, incidence of wound infection, surgical or other complications following operation between the two groups. However, the postoperative stay was significantly prolonged in the T-tube group, to a median of 11 days, compared to 8 days in the primary closure group (P = 0.0001). This prolongation in stay was unrelated to whether admission was as an emergency or elective. T-tube drainage of the bile continued for a median of 7 days postoperative, whereas the bile drained via a wound drain in only 13 (35%) of the primary closure group, for a median of 5 days in these 13 patients. Long-term follow up was achieved in 48 patients, by a questionnaire sent at a median of 2.8 years following operation. Abdominal pains following recovery from the operation were experienced by 18% of the primary closure group and 20% of the T-tube group. No patient developed jaundice or pancreatitis, nor needed further biliary surgery following operation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
胆总管探查术后行T管引流已成为标准的外科手术操作。这项随机前瞻性研究比较了结石性疾病探查术后胆总管一期缝合与T管引流的效果。37例患者接受了一期缝合,26例患者接受了T管引流下的缝合。两组在年龄、手术指征、相关疾病、术前胆红素、淀粉酶及白细胞计数方面具有可比性。一期缝合组43%的手术由顾问医师完成,T管引流组为65%。两组手术时间、伤口感染发生率、术后手术或其他并发症方面无显著差异。然而,T管引流组术后住院时间显著延长,中位数为11天,而一期缝合组为8天(P = 0.0001)。住院时间的延长与入院是急诊还是择期无关。术后胆汁T管引流的中位数为7天,而一期缝合组仅有13例(35%)通过伤口引流胆汁,这13例患者的胆汁引流中位数为5天。48例患者通过术后中位数2.8年发送的问卷进行了长期随访。一期缝合组18%的患者和T管引流组20%的患者术后恢复过程中出现腹痛。术后无患者发生黄疸或胰腺炎,也无需进一步的胆道手术。(摘要截取自250字)