• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胆总管探查术后一期胆管缝合与T管引流的比较

Primary duct closure versus T-tube drainage following exploration of the common bile duct.

作者信息

Williams J A, Treacy P J, Sidey P, Worthley C S, Townsend N C, Russell E A

机构信息

Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgical Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Australia.

出版信息

Aust N Z J Surg. 1994 Dec;64(12):823-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1994.tb04556.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1445-2197.1994.tb04556.x
PMID:7980254
Abstract

T-tube drainage of the common bile duct (CBD) following duct exploration has become standard surgical practice. This randomized prospective study has compared primary closure versus T-tube drainage of the CBD following exploration for calculous disease. Thirty-seven patients underwent primary closure and 26 underwent closure over T-tube. Both groups were comparable in terms of age, indications for surgery, associated illnesses, pre-operative bilirubin, amylase and white cell count. Forty-three per cent of operations were performed by a consultant in the primary closure group and 65% in the T-tube group. There was no significant difference in the duration of operation, incidence of wound infection, surgical or other complications following operation between the two groups. However, the postoperative stay was significantly prolonged in the T-tube group, to a median of 11 days, compared to 8 days in the primary closure group (P = 0.0001). This prolongation in stay was unrelated to whether admission was as an emergency or elective. T-tube drainage of the bile continued for a median of 7 days postoperative, whereas the bile drained via a wound drain in only 13 (35%) of the primary closure group, for a median of 5 days in these 13 patients. Long-term follow up was achieved in 48 patients, by a questionnaire sent at a median of 2.8 years following operation. Abdominal pains following recovery from the operation were experienced by 18% of the primary closure group and 20% of the T-tube group. No patient developed jaundice or pancreatitis, nor needed further biliary surgery following operation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

胆总管探查术后行T管引流已成为标准的外科手术操作。这项随机前瞻性研究比较了结石性疾病探查术后胆总管一期缝合与T管引流的效果。37例患者接受了一期缝合,26例患者接受了T管引流下的缝合。两组在年龄、手术指征、相关疾病、术前胆红素、淀粉酶及白细胞计数方面具有可比性。一期缝合组43%的手术由顾问医师完成,T管引流组为65%。两组手术时间、伤口感染发生率、术后手术或其他并发症方面无显著差异。然而,T管引流组术后住院时间显著延长,中位数为11天,而一期缝合组为8天(P = 0.0001)。住院时间的延长与入院是急诊还是择期无关。术后胆汁T管引流的中位数为7天,而一期缝合组仅有13例(35%)通过伤口引流胆汁,这13例患者的胆汁引流中位数为5天。48例患者通过术后中位数2.8年发送的问卷进行了长期随访。一期缝合组18%的患者和T管引流组20%的患者术后恢复过程中出现腹痛。术后无患者发生黄疸或胰腺炎,也无需进一步的胆道手术。(摘要截取自250字)

相似文献

1
Primary duct closure versus T-tube drainage following exploration of the common bile duct.胆总管探查术后一期胆管缝合与T管引流的比较
Aust N Z J Surg. 1994 Dec;64(12):823-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1994.tb04556.x.
2
Long-term Outcome of Primary Closure After Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration Combined With Choledochoscopy.腹腔镜胆总管探查联合胆道镜检查术后一期缝合的长期预后
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2015 Jun;25(3):250-3. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000151.
3
Laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct with primary closure versus T-tube drainage: a randomized clinical trial.腹腔镜胆总管探查一期缝合与T管引流的随机临床试验
J Surg Res. 2009 Nov;157(1):e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2009.03.012. Epub 2009 Apr 18.
4
Antegrade biliary stenting versus T-tube drainage after laparoscopic choledochotomy--a comparative cohort study.腹腔镜胆总管切开术后顺行胆道支架置入术与T管引流术的比较队列研究
Hepatogastroenterology. 2006 May-Jun;53(69):330-4.
5
Randomized comparison of postoperative short-term and mid-term complications between T-tube and primary closure after CBD exploration.胆总管探查术后T管引流与一期缝合术后短期和中期并发症的随机对照比较。
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2014 Nov;24(11):810-4.
6
Primary closure versus T-tube drainage after open common bile duct exploration.胆总管切开探查术后一期缝合与T管引流的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jan 24(1):CD005640. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005640.pub2.
7
Transcystic approach with micro-incision of the cystic duct and its confluence part in laparoscopic common bile duct exploration.腹腔镜胆总管探查术中经胆囊途径行胆囊管及其汇合部微切口手术
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2013 Dec;23(12):977-81. doi: 10.1089/lap.2013.0309. Epub 2013 Oct 18.
8
Primary Closure Versus T-Tube Drainage Following Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration in Patients With Previous Biliary Surgery.既往胆道手术患者腹腔镜胆总管探查术后一期缝合与 T 管引流的对比。
Am Surg. 2021 Jan;87(1):50-55. doi: 10.1177/0003134820947396. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
9
T-tube drainage versus primary closure after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration.腹腔镜胆总管探查术后T管引流与一期缝合的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jun 21;2013(6):CD005641. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005641.pub3.
10
Appropriate Patient Selection Is Essential for the Success of Primary Closure After Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration.合适的患者选择对于腹腔镜胆总管探查术后一期缝合的成功至关重要。
Dig Dis Sci. 2017 May;62(5):1321-1326. doi: 10.1007/s10620-017-4507-0. Epub 2017 Mar 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Surgical application of an implantable biliary access device in the treatment of refractory recurrent cholangiolithiasis.可植入式胆道通路装置在难治性复发性胆管结石治疗中的手术应用。
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023 May 1;13(5):3333-3342. doi: 10.21037/qims-22-922. Epub 2023 Mar 17.
2
Primary Closure vs T-Tube Drainage Following Open Choledochotomy for CBD (Common Bile Duct) Stones.胆总管结石行胆总管切开术后一期缝合与T管引流的比较
Cureus. 2023 Mar 6;15(3):e35846. doi: 10.7759/cureus.35846. eCollection 2023 Mar.
3
Evaluation of the Common bile duct (CBD) Diameter After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (LC) and Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration (LCBDE): A Retrospective Study.
腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)和腹腔镜胆总管探查术(LCBDE)后胆总管(CBD)直径的评估:一项回顾性研究。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2023 Feb 1;33(1):62-68. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001135.
4
Comparison of Primary Suture and T-Tube Drainage After Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration Combined with Intraoperative Choledochoscopy in the Treatment of Secondary Common Bile Duct Stones: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis.腹腔镜胆总管探查联合术中胆道镜取石术后一期缝合与 T 管引流治疗继发性胆总管结石的对比:单中心回顾性分析。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2022 Jun;32(6):612-619. doi: 10.1089/lap.2021.0418. Epub 2021 Sep 14.
5
Surgical (Open and laparoscopic) management of large difficult CBD stones after different sessions of endoscopic failure: A retrospective cohort study.内镜治疗失败不同疗程后大型复杂胆总管结石的手术(开放和腹腔镜)治疗:一项回顾性队列研究
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2019 May 31;43:52-63. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2019.05.007. eCollection 2019 Jul.
6
Temporary CBD Stenting with a Nelaton Tube Is a More Practical and Safer Option Than T-Tube Drainage after Conventional CBD Exploration for Choledocholithiasis.对于胆总管结石,在传统胆总管探查术后,使用内拉通管进行临时性胆总管支架置入术比T管引流术更实用、更安全。
HPB Surg. 2018 Sep 13;2018:8035164. doi: 10.1155/2018/8035164. eCollection 2018.
7
Retrospective Clinical Study of the Effects of T-Tube Placement for Bile Duct Stricture.胆管狭窄 T 管放置效果的回顾性临床研究。
Med Sci Monit. 2017 Sep 8;23:4328-4333. doi: 10.12659/msm.906630.
8
Risk Factors Associated With Residual Stones in Common Bile Duct Via T Tube Cholangiography After Common Bile Duct Exploration.胆总管探查术后经T管胆管造影胆总管残留结石的相关危险因素
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Jul;94(26):e1043. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001043.
9
Systematic review with meta-analysis of studies comparing primary duct closure and T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for choledocholithiasis.对比较腹腔镜胆总管探查取石术后一期胆管缝合与T管引流治疗胆总管结石的研究进行系统评价和Meta分析。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Mar;30(3):845-61. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4303-x. Epub 2015 Jun 20.
10
Hepatectomy with primary closure of common bile duct for hepatolithiasis combined with choledocholithiasis.肝切除术联合胆总管一期缝合治疗肝内胆管结石合并胆总管结石
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Mar 28;21(12):3564-70. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i12.3564.