• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过正面清单进行药品处方质量控制——欧洲药品处方集

Quality control of drug prescriptions by positive lists--the European Formulary.

作者信息

Glaeske G

机构信息

Pharmakologischer Beratungsdienst der VdAK, Siegburg, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1994 Aug;32(8):403-8.

PMID:7981924
Abstract

The overall quality of drug prescription is based on three elements: structural, procedural and result quality. In order to improve the clinical outcome (= result quality) of a patient, only drugs with a proven efficacy and a well known risk/benefit-relation should be prescribed. However, in 1992 in Germany, 31.1% of the ambulatory drug prescriptions were for drugs with questionable efficacy or dubious combination preparations. These expenditures therefore cannot be justified, neither from a pharmacological point of view nor from an economic standpoint. One of the main reasons for this poor prescribing quality is a poor structural quality, i.e. too many drugs and lack of transparency on the market and a producer-oriented drug information. In order to improve this structural quality, a drug list will be established by a group of 33 pharmacologists, physicians and pharmacists from 15 European countries. This list aims at 66 diseases, which are thought to be the most common for the general practitioners everyday routine. For these illnesses drug therapies are recommended including information on drug side-effects, possible interactions and contra-indications. Furthermore, basing on published literature, all possible drugs for the 66 indications will be discussed explaining and underlining the choice of the European Formulary Group. However, even a comprehensive drug list may not rule out insufficient procedural quality, i.e. too lengthy prescriptions of benzodiazepines, but may hopefully facilitate the rational choice of drugs and therefore improve patients outcome.

摘要

药物处方的总体质量基于三个要素

结构质量、程序质量和结果质量。为了改善患者的临床结局(即结果质量),应仅开具已证实疗效且风险/效益关系明确的药物。然而,1992年在德国,31.1%的门诊药物处方是用于疗效存疑的药物或可疑的复方制剂。因此,无论从药理学角度还是经济角度来看,这些支出都是不合理的。处方质量差的主要原因之一是结构质量差,即市场上药物过多且缺乏透明度,以及以生产商为导向的药物信息。为了改善这种结构质量,来自15个欧洲国家的33名药理学家、医生和药剂师将制定一份药物清单。该清单针对66种疾病,这些疾病被认为是全科医生日常诊疗中最常见的。针对这些疾病推荐了药物治疗方案,包括药物副作用、可能的相互作用和禁忌证等信息。此外,基于已发表的文献,将讨论66种适应证的所有可能药物,解释并强调欧洲处方集小组的选择。然而,即使是一份全面的药物清单也可能无法排除程序质量不足的问题,即苯二氮䓬类药物处方过长,但有望促进药物的合理选择,从而改善患者的结局。

相似文献

1
Quality control of drug prescriptions by positive lists--the European Formulary.通过正面清单进行药品处方质量控制——欧洲药品处方集
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1994 Aug;32(8):403-8.
2
Attitudes of primary care physicians towards the use of a drug formulary--preliminary results of a study in Germany.基层医疗医生对使用药品处方集的态度——德国一项研究的初步结果
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1994 Aug;32(8):400-2.
3
Development of indicators for assessing the quality of prescribing of lipid-lowering drugs: data from the pharmacotherapeutic quality circles in Hesse, Germany.降脂药物处方质量评估指标的制定:来自德国黑森州药物治疗质量改进小组的数据
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2001 Nov;39(11):492-8.
4
Croatian pharmaceutical sector reform project: rational drug use.克罗地亚制药行业改革项目:合理用药
Croat Med J. 2004 Oct;45(5):611-9.
5
[Prescribing patterns of antipsychotics in 13 French psychiatric hospitals].[法国13家精神病医院抗精神病药物的处方模式]
Encephale. 2009 Apr;35(2):129-38. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2008.03.007. Epub 2008 Jul 7.
6
Determinants of the range of drugs prescribed in general practice: a cross-sectional analysis.全科医疗中所开药物范围的决定因素:一项横断面分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 Aug 22;7:132. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-132.
7
Opioids and the management of chronic severe pain in the elderly: consensus statement of an International Expert Panel with focus on the six clinically most often used World Health Organization Step III opioids (buprenorphine, fentanyl, hydromorphone, methadone, morphine, oxycodone).阿片类药物与老年人慢性重度疼痛的管理:一个国际专家小组的共识声明,重点关注世界卫生组织第三阶梯临床最常用的六种阿片类药物(丁丙诺啡、芬太尼、氢吗啡酮、美沙酮、吗啡、羟考酮)。
Pain Pract. 2008 Jul-Aug;8(4):287-313. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2008.00204.x. Epub 2008 May 23.
8
Factors that influence prescribing decisions.影响处方决策的因素。
Ann Pharmacother. 2004 Apr;38(4):557-62. doi: 10.1345/aph.1D390. Epub 2004 Feb 13.
9
Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.德国药品效益评估的程序和方法。
Eur J Health Econ. 2008 Nov;9 Suppl 1:5-29. doi: 10.1007/s10198-008-0122-5.
10
Off-label use of drugs in pain medicine and palliative care: an algorithm for the assessment of its safe and legal prescription.疼痛医学与姑息治疗中药物的超说明书用药:安全合法处方评估算法
Pain Pract. 2008 May-Jun;8(3):157-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2008.00189.x. Epub 2008 Mar 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Dutch hospital drug formularies: pharmacotherapeutic variation and conservatism, but concurrence with national pharmacotherapeutic guidelines.荷兰医院药品处方集:药物治疗的差异与保守性,但与国家药物治疗指南一致。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2000 Mar;49(3):254-63. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2000.00166.x.
2
The quality of Dutch hospital drug formularies: evaluation of technical features and organisational information.荷兰医院药品处方集的质量:技术特征与组织信息评估
Pharm World Sci. 1999 Jun;21(3):120-6. doi: 10.1023/a:1008680021854.
3
The application of adverse drug reaction data to drug choice decisions made by pharmacy and therapeutics committees. An Australian perspective.
药品不良反应数据在药学与治疗学委员会药物选择决策中的应用。澳大利亚视角。
Drug Saf. 1998 Mar;18(3):153-9. doi: 10.2165/00002018-199818030-00001.
4
Drug prescription in Italy.意大利的药物处方。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1996;49(6):429-30. doi: 10.1007/BF00195926.