• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

药品不良反应数据在药学与治疗学委员会药物选择决策中的应用。澳大利亚视角。

The application of adverse drug reaction data to drug choice decisions made by pharmacy and therapeutics committees. An Australian perspective.

作者信息

Weekes L M, Day R O

机构信息

New South Wales Therapeutic Assessment Group Inc., Darlinghurst, Australia.

出版信息

Drug Saf. 1998 Mar;18(3):153-9. doi: 10.2165/00002018-199818030-00001.

DOI:10.2165/00002018-199818030-00001
PMID:9530535
Abstract

Pharmacy and Therapeutics (P&T) committees undertake policy, regulatory and educational activities to promote rational use of medicines in their institutions with the aim of improving the quality of health and economic outcomes at these institutions. Formulary management is an important part of the P&T committees' activities and making drug choices is one of the committees' most difficult tasks. The 3 types of information most commonly identified by P&T committees as necessary for making drug choices are effectiveness, safety and cost data; usually in this order of importance. There is some evidence, however, that safety data are not considered by all committees when they make decisions about adding a new drug to a formulary. The role of adverse drug reaction (ADR) data in formulary decision-making (for registered drugs) occurs at several levels. First, ADR data obtained from pre-marketing studies of the drug are important and enable the committee to make an assessment of the risk of toxicity that should be anticipated for the drug. However, the limited nature of this information makes an absolute assessment impossible. Secondly, comparative safety information is necessary when deciding the place in therapy of a particular drug. Weighing up the comparative risks and benefits is a complex task which is a routine activity for most P&T committees whatever level of sophistication is applied. Thirdly, ADR data are an important ingredient of any economic assessment considered by a P&T committee. Calculation of the costs and consequences associated with the adverse effects of treatment demand careful assessment. Finally, aggregated adverse drug event reports which collate not only the consequences of adverse drug reactions but also medication incidents (medication errors) and which have been reported locally can be a useful quality assurance process for a P&T committee. This information will contribute to the identification of drugs for deletion from the formulary and less commonly in making decisions about additions to the formulary. As formulary management forms only part of a P&T committee's work, so the committee's interest in ADR is broader than the use of these data in making drug choices. The P&T committee may also be involved in promoting ADR reporting to either a central database or primary carers. Although often of limited availability, ADR information has an important role in the formulary management process of P&T committees.

摘要

药学与治疗学(P&T)委员会开展政策制定、监管及教育活动,以促进其所在机构合理用药,目的是提高这些机构的医疗质量和经济效益。药品目录管理是P&T委员会活动的重要组成部分,而选择药物是委员会最艰巨的任务之一。P&T委员会在选择药物时最常确定的三类必要信息是有效性、安全性和成本数据;通常按此重要性顺序排列。然而,有证据表明,并非所有委员会在决定将一种新药添加到药品目录时都会考虑安全性数据。药品不良反应(ADR)数据在药品目录决策(针对已注册药品)中的作用体现在多个层面。首先,从药物上市前研究中获得的ADR数据很重要,能使委员会对该药物可能预期的毒性风险进行评估。然而,这些信息的局限性使得无法进行绝对评估。其次,在确定特定药物在治疗中的地位时,比较安全性信息是必要的。权衡比较风险和益处是一项复杂的任务,对于大多数P&T委员会而言,无论采用何种复杂程度的方法,这都是一项常规活动。第三,ADR数据是P&T委员会进行的任何经济评估的重要组成部分。计算与治疗不良反应相关的成本和后果需要仔细评估。最后,汇总的药品不良事件报告不仅整理了药品不良反应的后果,还包括用药事件(用药错误),并且是本地报告的,这对P&T委员会来说可能是一个有用的质量保证过程。这些信息将有助于确定从药品目录中删除的药物,在决定添加药物到药品目录时作用相对较小。由于药品目录管理只是P&T委员会工作的一部分,所以委员会对ADR的关注范围比在药物选择中使用这些数据更为广泛。P&T委员会还可能参与促进向中央数据库或初级护理人员报告ADR。尽管ADR信息通常可用性有限,但在P&T委员会的药品目录管理过程中具有重要作用。

相似文献

1
The application of adverse drug reaction data to drug choice decisions made by pharmacy and therapeutics committees. An Australian perspective.药品不良反应数据在药学与治疗学委员会药物选择决策中的应用。澳大利亚视角。
Drug Saf. 1998 Mar;18(3):153-9. doi: 10.2165/00002018-199818030-00001.
2
A survey of selective administration procedures in formulary maintenance.药品目录维护中的选择性给药程序调查。
Hosp Pharm. 1981 Jul;15(7):371-4, 378-80.
3
Formularies: the role of pharmacy-and-therapeutics (P&T) committees.药品目录:药学与治疗学(P&T)委员会的作用
Clin Ther. 1993 Mar-Apr;15(2):433-41; discussion 432.
4
A survey of Pharmacy and Therapeutic committees across Canada: scope and responsibilities.加拿大各地药学与治疗学委员会调查:范围与职责
Can J Clin Pharmacol. 2009 Winter;16(1):e171-7. Epub 2009 Feb 25.
5
Formulary decision making: identifying factors that influence P&T committee drug evaluations.处方集决策:识别影响药品与治疗学委员会药物评估的因素。
Hosp Formul. 1988 Feb;23(2):174-8.
6
Drug formulary decision-making: Ethnographic study of 3 pharmacy and therapeutics committees.药物处方决策:3 个药剂和治疗学委员会的民族志研究。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2019 Apr 8;76(8):537-542. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxz022.
7
Structure and activities of pharmacy and therapeutics committees among public hospitals in South Africa; findings and implications.南非公立医院药学与治疗学委员会的结构与活动;研究结果及启示
Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Nov;10(11):1273-1280. doi: 10.1080/17512433.2017.1364625. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
8
Pharmacoeconomic analysis in formulary decisions: an international perspective.处方集决策中的药物经济学分析:国际视角
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1994 Oct 15;51(20):2593-8.
9
Activities, functions, and structure of pharmacy and therapeutics committees in large teaching hospitals.大型教学医院药学与治疗学委员会的活动、职能及结构
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 1999 Apr 1;56(7):622-8. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/56.7.622.
10
Access to new cardiovascular therapies in Canadian hospitals: a national survey of the formulary process.加拿大医院获取新型心血管治疗方法的情况:一项关于药品处方集制定流程的全国性调查。
Can J Cardiol. 2003 Feb;19(2):173-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Drug and therapeutics committees in Jordanian hospitals: a nation-wide survey of organization, activities, and drug selection procedures.约旦医院的药物与治疗学委员会:一项关于组织、活动及药物选择程序的全国性调查。
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2019 Oct-Dec;17(4):1590. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2019.4.1590. Epub 2019 Nov 3.
2
Prioritising drug and therapeutics committee (DTC) decisions: a national survey.药物与治疗学委员会(DTC)决策的优先级排序:一项全国性调查。
Pharm World Sci. 2007 Apr;29(2):90-6. doi: 10.1007/s11096-006-9074-y. Epub 2006 Dec 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Editors' roundtable: Current formulas for P & T Committee success (Part 1).
Hosp Formul. 1987 Mar;22(3):288-98.
2
Application of decision analysis to drug selection for formulary addition.决策分析在药物选择以供纳入药品目录中的应用。
Hosp Formul. 1987 Jul;22(7):658-63, 673, 676.
3
Indicators for drug and therapeutics committees.药物与治疗学委员会的指标
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1998 Apr;45(4):393-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1998.t01-1-00699.x.
4
Reporting of adverse events in hospitals in Victoria, 1994-1995.
Med J Aust. 1997 May 5;166(9):460-3. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1997.tb123216.x.
5
Drug and Therapeutics Committees in Australia: expected and actual performance.澳大利亚的药物与治疗委员会:预期表现与实际表现
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1996 Nov;42(5):551-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1996.tb00048.x.
6
Drug formularies provide a path to best care.
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 1996 Sep 15;53(18):2201-3. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/53.18.2201.
7
Formularies: the role of pharmacy-and-therapeutics (P&T) committees.药品目录:药学与治疗学(P&T)委员会的作用
Clin Ther. 1993 Mar-Apr;15(2):433-41; discussion 432.
8
A multiattribute-utility-function approach to weighing the risks and benefits of pharmaceutical agents.一种用于权衡药物风险与益处的多属性效用函数方法。
Med Decis Making. 1993 Apr-Jun;13(2):118-25. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9301300205.
9
Drug expectations and drug choices of hospital physicians.
J Intern Med. 1993 Aug;234(2):155-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.1993.tb00725.x.
10
How can hospitals ration drugs? Drug rationing in a teaching hospital: a method to assign priorities. Drug Committee of the Royal Adelaide Hospital.医院如何进行药品配给?一家教学医院的药品配给:一种确定优先级的方法。阿德莱德皇家医院药品委员会。
BMJ. 1994 Apr 2;308(6933):901-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6933.901.