Verzijlbergen J F, van Oudheusden D, Cramer M J, Ascoop C A, Zwinderman A H, Niemeyer M G, van der Wall E E, Pauwels E K
Department of Nuclear Medicine, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
Eur Heart J. 1994 Sep;15(9):1217-26. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a060656.
Application of the Thallium-201 quantitative analysis method to Tc-99m Sestamibi planar myocardial perfusion images results in oversubtraction of tissue crosstalk, defined as 'activity within the myocardial image, which originated outside the heart'. A modified algorithm, specific for Tc-99m Sestamibi, was applied in 60 patients and the results of quantitative analysis to estimate the risk of coronary artery disease were compared with coronary angiographic findings and with visual analysis. New crosstalk planes were generated based on the results in 20 male healthy volunteers. The results in our study group indicate a higher diagnostic accuracy when circumferential profiles are generated on the basis of maximal counts compared to mean counts. Quantitative analysis was able to predict the presence or absence of CAD as accurately as visual analysis. Odds ratios were 1.07 and 1.32 respectively (P < 0.001) for both quantitative maximal uptake and visual uptake analysis. Sensitivity of visual analysis alone was 89%, increasing to 96% with combined visual/quantitative analysis. Specificity of visual analysis decreased from 79% to 64% with combined analysis. Although only minor differences are seen, the maximal count uptake profiles were found to have additional diagnostic value compared to visual analysis alone.
将铊-201定量分析方法应用于锝-99m甲氧基异丁基异腈平面心肌灌注图像时,会导致组织串扰的过度扣除,组织串扰定义为“心肌图像内源自心脏外的活性”。对60例患者应用了一种针对锝-99m甲氧基异丁基异腈的改良算法,并将定量分析评估冠状动脉疾病风险的结果与冠状动脉造影结果及视觉分析结果进行比较。根据20名男性健康志愿者的结果生成了新的串扰平面。我们研究组的结果表明,与基于平均计数生成圆周轮廓相比,基于最大计数生成圆周轮廓时诊断准确性更高。定量分析预测冠状动脉疾病存在与否的准确性与视觉分析相当。定量最大摄取和视觉摄取分析的优势比分别为1.07和1.32(P<0.001)。单独视觉分析的敏感性为89%,视觉/定量联合分析时增至96%。联合分析时,视觉分析的特异性从79%降至64%。尽管差异不大,但发现最大计数摄取轮廓与单独视觉分析相比具有额外的诊断价值。