Bick R L
Semin Thromb Hemost. 1976 Oct;3(2):59-82. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1086129.
This chapter has provided a review of available literature regarding alterations of hemostasis associated with CPB. The primary pathology of altered hemostasis during CPB appears to be two-fold: (1) a functional platelet defect of unclear etiology, which occurs in virtually all patients, and (2) a primary hyperfibino(geno)lytic defect which occurs in the majority of patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. Significant thrombocytopenia does not appear to be a consistent problem, and is probably a function of perfusion technics; this may, however, be an important source of hemorrhage in some instances. Although hyperheparinemia, heparin rebound, and protamine excess have occasionally been incriminated as sources of hemorrhage during CPB, no well documented cases appear in the literature. Likewise, although DIC gained popularity in early reports of CPB hemorrahge, it appears that this syndrome rarely, if ever, arises as a consequence of CPB alone; it can be seen, however, in CPB patients who are provided a triggerin situation for DIC, such as shock, sepsis, or hemolytic transfusion reaction. It is likely that many reported alterations of hemostasis during CPB which were concluded to represent DIC actually were due to hyperfibino(geno)lysis. The key to prevention of CPB hemorrhage rests simply in obtaining an adequate preoperative workup. Of extreme importance is an adequate history with respect to bleeding tendencies in both patient and family; of equal importance is a careful history regarding antiplatelet drugs. A careful physical examination, searching for clues of a real or potential bleeding diathesis, also can often prevent catastrophic cases of CPB hemorrhage. Lastly, an adequate presurgical laboratory screen must be performed; in addition to the usual prothrombin time, partial thromboplastin time, and platelet count, a thrombin time and standardized template bleeding time must be added. The addition of these two simple modalities will insure against significant defects in fibrinogen, the fibrinolytic system, vascular function, and platelet function. When CPB hemorrhage occurs, simple laboratory screening will usually allow for a quick hemostasis evaluation. The parameters recommended in this review will distinguish between surgical and nonsurgical bleeding and should, therefore, allow for a quick decision regarding necessity for reexploration and the adequacy of hemostasis if reexploration is needed. In addition, this screen will distinguish between difficulties with heparin, protamine, and the fibrinolytic system. The vast majority of nonsurgical hemorrhages during CPB is due to a functional platlet defect, primary hyperfibrino(geno)lysis, or a combination of these. The quick administration of platelet concentrates, while awaiting laboratory evaluation, will control or significantly blunt most instances of CPB hemorrhage. If platelets fail to control bleeding, and reasonable laboratory evidence of primary hyperfibrino(geno)lysis is present, antifibrinolytics should then be used...
本章回顾了与体外循环(CPB)相关的止血功能改变的现有文献。CPB期间止血功能改变的主要病理似乎有两个方面:(1)病因不明的功能性血小板缺陷,几乎所有患者都会出现;(2)原发性高纤维蛋白(原)溶解缺陷,大多数接受体外循环的患者会出现。明显的血小板减少似乎不是一个持续存在的问题,可能是灌注技术的作用;然而,在某些情况下,这可能是出血的一个重要来源。虽然高肝素血症、肝素反跳和鱼精蛋白过量偶尔被认为是CPB期间出血的原因,但文献中没有充分记录的病例。同样,虽然弥散性血管内凝血(DIC)在CPB出血的早期报告中很常见,但似乎这种综合征很少(如果有的话)仅由CPB引起;然而,在有DIC触发情况的CPB患者中可以看到,如休克、败血症或溶血性输血反应。很可能许多报告的CPB期间的止血改变被认为是DIC,实际上是由于高纤维蛋白(原)溶解。预防CPB出血的关键仅仅在于进行充分的术前检查。极其重要的是了解患者及其家族中关于出血倾向的充分病史;同样重要的是关于抗血小板药物的详细病史。仔细的体格检查,寻找实际或潜在出血素质的线索,也常常可以预防CPB出血的灾难性病例。最后,必须进行充分的术前实验室筛查;除了通常的凝血酶原时间、部分凝血活酶时间和血小板计数外,还必须增加凝血酶时间和标准化模板出血时间。增加这两种简单的检查方法将确保不会出现纤维蛋白原、纤维蛋白溶解系统、血管功能和血小板功能的重大缺陷。当发生CPB出血时,简单的实验室筛查通常可以快速进行止血评估。本综述中推荐的参数将区分手术出血和非手术出血,因此应该能够快速决定是否需要再次探查以及如果需要再次探查时止血是否充分。此外,这种筛查将区分肝素、鱼精蛋白和纤维蛋白溶解系统的问题。CPB期间绝大多数非手术出血是由于功能性血小板缺陷、原发性高纤维蛋白(原)溶解或两者的组合。在等待实验室评估期间,快速输注血小板浓缩物将控制或显著减轻大多数CPB出血情况。如果血小板不能控制出血,并且存在原发性高纤维蛋白(原)溶解的合理实验室证据,那么应该使用抗纤维蛋白溶解剂……