Suppr超能文献

《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订本中破坏性行为的儿童行为标准结构:验证性因素模型

Structure of DSM-III-R criteria for disruptive childhood behaviors: confirmatory factor models.

作者信息

Fergusson D M, Horwood L J, Lynskey M T

机构信息

Christchurch Health and Development Study, Christchurch School of Medicine, Christchurch Hospital, New Zealand.

出版信息

J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1994 Oct;33(8):1145-55; discussion 155-7. doi: 10.1097/00004583-199410000-00010.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aims of this analysis were to examine the extent to which DSM-III-R criteria for disruptive behavior patterns were consistent with the system of diagnoses proposed. Particular attention was paid to (1) whether oppositional defiant disorder is factorially distinct from conduct disorder (CD) and (2) the extent to which CD can be further classified into overt and covert CD behaviors.

METHOD

Data were gathered on DSM-III-R criteria for disruptive behavior patterns for a sample of 739 New Zealand 15-year-olds using data provided by parental and self-report. These data were supplemented by officially recorded police contact data.

RESULTS

Application of methods of confirmatory factor analysis suggested that the diagnostic criteria in DSM-III-R reflected a constellation of distinct but highly correlated behavioral domains, with these domains corresponding to oppositional defiant disorder, overt CD (aggression, violence), covert CD (theft, dishonesty), and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder behavior. Results of second-order factor analysis methods suggested that these dimensions reflected two general higher-order factors, with the first factor reflecting the extent to which the individual displayed behavioral symptoms of oppositional defiant disorder and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and the second reflecting the extent to which the individual expressed antisocial, conduct-disordered behaviors.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of confirmatory factor analysis generally support and validate the diagnostic classifications proposed in DSM-III-R but suggest possible refinements that draw distinctions between overt and covert expressions of CD.

摘要

目的

本分析旨在检验《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第三版修订版》(DSM-III-R)中破坏性行为模式的标准与所提出的诊断系统的一致程度。特别关注以下两点:(1)对立违抗性障碍在因素上是否与品行障碍(CD)不同;(2)品行障碍可进一步分类为公开型和隐蔽型品行障碍行为的程度。

方法

利用父母报告和自我报告提供的数据,收集了739名新西兰15岁青少年破坏性行为模式的DSM-III-R标准数据。这些数据由官方记录的警方接触数据补充。

结果

验证性因素分析方法的应用表明,DSM-III-R中的诊断标准反映了一系列不同但高度相关的行为领域,这些领域对应于对立违抗性障碍、公开型品行障碍(攻击、暴力)、隐蔽型品行障碍(盗窃、不诚实)和注意力缺陷多动障碍行为。二阶因素分析方法的结果表明,这些维度反映了两个一般的高阶因素,第一个因素反映个体表现出对立违抗性障碍和注意力缺陷多动障碍行为症状的程度,第二个因素反映个体表现出反社会、品行障碍行为的程度。

结论

验证性因素分析的结果总体上支持并验证了DSM-III-R中提出但建议的可能改进,这些改进区分了品行障碍的公开型和隐蔽型表现。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验