Suppr超能文献

《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版(DSM-III)与第三版修订本(DSM-III-R)对青春期前儿童诊断的比较:患病率和效度的变化

Comparison of DSM-III and DSM-III-R diagnoses for prepubertal children: changes in prevalence and validity.

作者信息

Lahey B B, Loeber R, Stouthamer-Loeber M, Christ M A, Green S, Russo M F, Frick P J, Dulcan M

机构信息

Georgia Children's Center, University of Georgia.

出版信息

J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1990 Jul;29(4):620-6. doi: 10.1097/00004583-199007000-00017.

Abstract

A structured and reliable diagnostic procedure based on a revised version of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children for children, parents, and teachers was used to assign both DSM-III and DSM-III-R diagnoses to 177 outpatient boys aged 7 to 12 years. Compared to their DSM-III counterparts, DSM-III-R oppositional defiant disorder was 25.5% less prevalent, DSM-III-R dysthymia was 37.8% less prevalent, and DSM-III-R conduct disorder (CD) was 44.3% less prevalent. However, DSM-III-R attention deficit hyperactivity disorder was 14.4% more prevalent than DSM-III attention deficit disorder with hyperactivity. The two definitions of CD were compared to exemplify an empirical approach to diagnostic validation. The DSM-III-R diagnosis of CD appears to be more valid as it is more strongly associated with police contacts, school suspensions, and history of antisocial personality disorder in the biological father, but both CD diagnoses are associated with family histories of criminal convictions.

摘要

我们采用了一种基于修订版儿童诊断访谈量表的结构化且可靠的诊断程序,该量表面向儿童、家长和教师,用于对177名7至12岁的门诊男孩进行DSM-III和DSM-III-R诊断。与DSM-III诊断结果相比,DSM-III-R对立违抗性障碍的患病率低25.5%,恶劣心境的患病率低37.8%,品行障碍(CD)的患病率低44.3%。然而,DSM-III-R注意缺陷多动障碍的患病率比DSM-III多动性注意缺陷障碍高14.4%。对品行障碍的两种定义进行了比较,以举例说明诊断验证的实证方法。DSM-III-R对品行障碍的诊断似乎更有效,因为它与警方接触、学校停学以及亲生父亲的反社会人格障碍病史有更强的关联,但两种品行障碍诊断都与刑事定罪家族史有关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验