McSherry W C, Holm J E
Department of Psychology, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks 58202.
J Clin Psychol. 1994 Jul;50(4):476-87. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(199407)50:4<476::aid-jclp2270500402>3.0.co;2-9.
This study examined whether Antonovsky's (1987) stress-resistance construct, sense of coherence (SOC), affected individuals' psychological and/or physiological responses to a controlled stressful situation. Subjects were assessed for SOC level and then completed a battery of questionnaires before and after a stressful situation. Physiological responses were monitored during baseline, anticipation, and recovery periods. Analyses examined differences among low, middle, and high SOC groups and revealed group differences in psychological distress, cognitive appraisal, coping processes, and pulse rate. These results provide some support for the validity and utility of Antonovsky's SOC construct by indicating that low SOC subjects show more distress and appraise and cope with stressful situations in ways less likely to resolve or eliminate their distress.
本研究考察了安托诺夫斯基（1987年）的抗压结构，即连贯感（SOC），是否会影响个体对可控压力情境的心理和/或生理反应。对受试者的SOC水平进行评估，然后在压力情境前后完成一系列问卷调查。在基线期、预期期和恢复期监测生理反应。分析考察了低、中、高SOC组之间的差异，结果显示，在心理困扰、认知评估、应对过程和脉搏率方面存在组间差异。这些结果为安托诺夫斯基的SOC结构的有效性和实用性提供了一些支持，表明低SOC受试者表现出更多的困扰，并且在评估和应对压力情境时，采用的方式不太可能解决或消除他们的困扰。
