• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基本人格量表临床量表与效度量表之间的关系。

Relationships among clinical and validity scales of the Basic Personality Inventory.

作者信息

Kroner D G, Reddon J R

机构信息

Millhaven Institution, Bath, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Clin Psychol. 1994 Jul;50(4):522-8. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(199407)50:4<522::aid-jclp2270500407>3.0.co;2-8.

DOI:10.1002/1097-4679(199407)50:4<522::aid-jclp2270500407>3.0.co;2-8
PMID:7983200
Abstract

In interpreting the results of a self-report inventory it is important to evaluate the extent to which stylistic distortion may have been operative. This task is complicated because validity measures frequently are confounded with content measures. In order to evaluate the potential utility of the validity measures for the Basic Personality Inventory (BPI) the relationships between validity measures and content scales were evaluated in a sample of 71 inmates. While some validity indices had significant correlations with content scales, other validity indices were relatively independent of the content scales. Recommendations are provided for using the BPI validity scales.

摘要

在解释自我报告量表的结果时,评估文体失真可能起作用的程度很重要。这项任务很复杂,因为效度测量常常与内容测量相混淆。为了评估基本人格量表(BPI)效度测量的潜在效用,在71名囚犯样本中评估了效度测量与内容量表之间的关系。虽然一些效度指标与内容量表有显著相关性,但其他效度指标相对独立于内容量表。文中给出了使用BPI效度量表的建议。

相似文献

1
Relationships among clinical and validity scales of the Basic Personality Inventory.基本人格量表临床量表与效度量表之间的关系。
J Clin Psychol. 1994 Jul;50(4):522-8. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(199407)50:4<522::aid-jclp2270500407>3.0.co;2-8.
2
The validity of the M test in a residential forensic facility.M测试在法医住院机构中的有效性。
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1993;21(1):111-21.
3
Rule-Out and Rule-In scales for the M test for malingering: a cross-validation.用于伪装测试的M测试的排除和纳入量表:一项交叉验证研究。
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1993;21(1):107-10.
4
Effect of symptom information and intelligence in dissimulation: an examination of faking response styles by inmates on the Basic Personality Inventory.症状信息与智力在伪装中的作用:对囚犯在基本人格量表上伪装反应方式的考察。
Assessment. 2007 Mar;14(1):22-34. doi: 10.1177/1073191106295404.
5
Further validation of the psychopathic personality inventory among offenders: personality and behavioral correlates.罪犯中精神病态人格问卷的进一步验证:人格与行为相关性
J Pers Disord. 2001 Oct;15(5):403-15. doi: 10.1521/pedi.15.5.403.19202.
6
The relationship between psychopathic personality features and malingering symptoms of major mental illness.精神病态人格特征与重度精神疾病诈病症状之间的关系。
Law Hum Behav. 2001 Dec;25(6):567-82. doi: 10.1023/a:1012702223004.
7
Identifying inmates at risk for disciplinary infractions: a comparison of two measures of psychopathy.识别有违纪风险的囚犯:两种精神病态测量方法的比较。
Behav Sci Law. 1999;17(4):435-43. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0798(199910/12)17:4<435::aid-bsl356>3.0.co;2-z.
8
Establishing construct and predictive validity of the prison inmate inventory for use with female inmates.建立适用于女性囚犯的监狱囚犯量表的结构效度和预测效度。
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2015 Feb;59(2):196-210. doi: 10.1177/0306624X13506393. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
9
Factor structure and construct validity of the psychopathic personality inventory in a forensic sample.在一个法医样本中,精神变态人格量表的因子结构和建构效度。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2013 Mar-Apr;36(2):176-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2013.01.010. Epub 2013 Feb 8.
10
A comparison of the psychometric properties of the psychopathic personality inventory full-length and short-form versions.长式和短式心理变态人格量表的心理测量特性比较。
Psychol Assess. 2012 Mar;24(1):261-7. doi: 10.1037/a0025832. Epub 2011 Oct 17.