Tobias J D, Rasmussen G E
Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.
Pediatr Clin North Am. 1994 Dec;41(6):1269-92. doi: 10.1016/s0031-3955(16)38873-3.
Several situations arise in the PICU patient that require the administration of drugs for sedation and analgesia. A "cookbook" approach is impossible because of the diversity of patient and clinical scenarios. When amnesia is required, these authors prefer a continuous infusion of a benzodiazepine such as midazolam or lorazepam. Although the majority of clinical experience has been with midazolam, lorazepam either by bolus dose or continuous infusion offers a cost-effective alternative. When analgesia is required, the addition of a continuous infusion of narcotic or the use of a PCA device in the older patient should prove effective. Although fentanyl is frequently chosen, morphine is an effective and cost-effective alternative for patients with stable cardiovascular function. The synthetic narcotics are recommended for neonates, especially following cardiac surgical procedures and those at risk for pulmonary vasospasm. Narcotics may also be used for the treatment of agitation in those situations that do not necessarily require analgesia. Our clinical experience suggests that narcotics may be more effective for sedation than benzodiazepines in children less than 1 year of age. When the above agents fail to be effective or are associated with cardiovascular depression, alternatives may include ketamine or pentobarbital. Ketamine may be useful for the unstable patient or those with a bronchospastic component to their disease process. We have found pentobarbital to be effective when the combination of benzodiazepines and narcotics fails to provide the desired level of sedation. Aside from these techniques, regional anesthesia may offer a more effective means of controlling pain in the PICU patient. These techniques may be effective when parenteral narcotics are inadequate or lead to undesired effects. Although most commonly used for postoperative analgesia, their use in patients with pain from other causes (e.g., multiple trauma) may be indicated, especially when parenteral narcotics may interfere with respiratory function or the ongoing assessment of the patient's mental status.
儿科重症监护病房(PICU)的患者会出现几种需要使用镇静和镇痛药物的情况。由于患者和临床情况的多样性,采用“按部就班”的方法是不可能的。当需要产生遗忘作用时,本文作者更倾向于持续输注苯二氮䓬类药物,如咪达唑仑或劳拉西泮。尽管大多数临床经验是关于咪达唑仑的,但劳拉西泮无论是静脉推注还是持续输注都提供了一种经济有效的替代方案。当需要镇痛时,对于年龄较大的患者,加用持续输注的麻醉剂或使用患者自控镇痛(PCA)设备应该是有效的。尽管经常选择芬太尼,但对于心血管功能稳定的患者,吗啡是一种有效且经济高效的替代药物。合成麻醉剂推荐用于新生儿,尤其是在心脏外科手术后以及有发生肺血管痉挛风险的新生儿。麻醉剂也可用于在不一定需要镇痛的情况下治疗躁动。我们的临床经验表明,在1岁以下的儿童中,麻醉剂用于镇静可能比苯二氮䓬类药物更有效。当上述药物无效或与心血管抑制相关时,替代药物可能包括氯胺酮或戊巴比妥。氯胺酮可能对病情不稳定的患者或疾病过程中有支气管痉挛成分的患者有用。我们发现,当苯二氮䓬类药物和麻醉剂联合使用未能达到所需的镇静水平时,戊巴比妥是有效的。除了这些技术外,区域麻醉可能为控制PICU患者的疼痛提供一种更有效的方法。当胃肠外麻醉剂不足或导致不良影响时,这些技术可能有效。尽管区域麻醉最常用于术后镇痛,但在有其他原因(如多处创伤)引起疼痛的患者中使用也可能是合适的,特别是当胃肠外麻醉剂可能干扰呼吸功能或正在进行的患者精神状态评估时。