Suppr超能文献

[睾丸精索静脉曲张。腹腔镜手术与传统手术的比较]

[Varicocele of the testis. A comparison between laparoscopic and conventional surgery].

作者信息

Poulsen E U, Willumsen H, Colstrup H, Jensen K M

机构信息

Urologisk afdeling, Skejby Sygehus, Arhus.

出版信息

Ugeskr Laeger. 1994 Sep 26;156(39):5683-5.

PMID:7985252
Abstract

We compared the results of laparoscopic varicocelectomy in 11 patients with those of 11 conventional varicocelectomies. There was a significantly longer operating time for laparoscopic surgery (45 versus 35 minutes), but a shorter hospital stay (one versus two days) and a quicker return to normal activity (two versus four days). There was no statistically significant difference in the outcome of surgery in the two groups concerning symptomatology and objective findings, but three patients, all conventionally operated, had no effect of the operation. One patient, operated laparoscopically, had signs of genitofemoral nerve injury. We conclude that laparoscopic varicocelectomy may be superior to conventional surgery, but further evaluation in larger, prospective studies is warranted.

摘要

我们将11例接受腹腔镜精索静脉结扎术的患者结果与11例接受传统精索静脉结扎术的患者结果进行了比较。腹腔镜手术的手术时间明显更长(45分钟对35分钟),但住院时间更短(1天对2天),恢复正常活动更快(2天对4天)。两组手术结果在症状学和客观检查结果方面无统计学显著差异,但3例接受传统手术的患者手术无效。1例接受腹腔镜手术的患者出现生殖股神经损伤迹象。我们得出结论,腹腔镜精索静脉结扎术可能优于传统手术,但需要在更大规模的前瞻性研究中进行进一步评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验