• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性心肌梗死后服用依那普利的生活质量

Quality of life on enalapril after acute myocardial infarction.

作者信息

Ekeberg O, Klemsdal T O, Kjeldsen S E

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Ullevaal Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Eur Heart J. 1994 Aug;15(8):1135-9. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a060640.

DOI:10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a060640
PMID:7988608
Abstract

Quality of life was assessed 4-6 months after an acute myocardial infarction in a randomized double-blind study of enalapril versus placebo. Quality of life was evaluated using the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP), the Physical Symptoms Distress Index (PSDI), the Work Performance Scale (WPS) and the Life Satisfaction Index (LSI). The study comprised 36 women (aged 46-85 years, mean 68) and 96 males (aged 39-81 years, mean 62). Quality of life did not differ significantly between patients treated with enalapril versus placebo. The scores were (enalapril vs placebo, mean +/- SE): average NHP 15.4 +/- 2.3 vs 17.1 +/- 2.3; PSDI 9.5 +/- 1.0 vs 10.8 +/- 0.9; WPS 19.8 +/- 2.0 vs 19.4 +/- 1.4; LSI 24.1 +/- 1.0 vs 22.5 +/- 1.4. Men reported a better quality of life than women on most assessments, and non-smokers and ex-smokers better than smokers. Patients with moderate or severe angina pectoris had a worse quality of life measured by PSDI and NHP than patients with minimal or no angina pectoris. Patients with congestive heart failure had a higher PSDI than those without (13.6 +/- 1.7 vs 9.4 +/- 0.7, P < 0.05), while no significant differences were observed in the NHP scores. In conclusion, quality of life was similar in enalapril and placebo-treated patients after an acute myocardial infarction. However, it was reduced in patients with angina pectoris or heart failure and in those who continued smoking.

摘要

在一项依那普利与安慰剂的随机双盲研究中,于急性心肌梗死后4 - 6个月评估生活质量。使用诺丁汉健康量表(NHP)、身体症状困扰指数(PSDI)、工作表现量表(WPS)和生活满意度指数(LSI)来评估生活质量。该研究纳入了36名女性(年龄46 - 85岁,平均68岁)和96名男性(年龄39 - 81岁,平均62岁)。接受依那普利治疗的患者与接受安慰剂治疗的患者在生活质量上没有显著差异。得分情况为(依那普利组对比安慰剂组,均值±标准误):NHP平均得分15.4±2.3对比17.1±2.3;PSDI为9.5±1.0对比10.8±0.9;WPS为19.8±2.0对比19.4±1.4;LSI为24.1±1.0对比22.5±1.4。在大多数评估中,男性报告的生活质量优于女性,非吸烟者和已戒烟者优于吸烟者。中度或重度心绞痛患者通过PSDI和NHP测量的生活质量比轻度或无心绞痛患者更差。充血性心力衰竭患者的PSDI高于无心力衰竭患者(13.6±1.7对比9.4±0.7,P < 0.05),而在NHP得分上未观察到显著差异。总之,急性心肌梗死后接受依那普利和安慰剂治疗的患者生活质量相似。然而,心绞痛或心力衰竭患者以及继续吸烟的患者生活质量降低。

相似文献

1
Quality of life on enalapril after acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死后服用依那普利的生活质量
Eur Heart J. 1994 Aug;15(8):1135-9. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a060640.
2
Effect on exercise performance of enalapril therapy initiated early after myocardial infarction. Nordic Enalapril exercise Trial.心肌梗死后早期开始使用依那普利治疗对运动能力的影响。北欧依那普利运动试验。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993 Oct;22(4):975-83. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(93)90406-q.
3
Quality of life among 5,025 patients with left ventricular dysfunction randomized between placebo and enalapril: the Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction. The SOLVD Investigators.5025例左心室功能不全患者在安慰剂和依那普利之间随机分组后的生活质量:左心室功能不全研究。SOLVD研究人员。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994 Feb;23(2):393-400. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)90426-x.
4
Review of quality-of-life evaluations in patients with angina pectoris.心绞痛患者生活质量评估综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 1999 Aug;16(2):141-52. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199916020-00003.
5
Effect of enalapril on myocardial infarction and unstable angina in patients with low ejection fractions.
Lancet. 1992 Nov 14;340(8829):1173-8. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)92889-n.
6
Potential proischemic effect of early enalapril in hypotension-prone patients with acute myocardial infarction. The CONSENSUS II Holter Substudy Group.
Cardiology. 1997 May-Jun;88(3):285-91. doi: 10.1159/000177344.
7
Effects of the early administration of enalapril on mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Results of the Cooperative New Scandinavian Enalapril Survival Study II (CONSENSUS II).早期应用依那普利对急性心肌梗死患者死亡率的影响。新斯堪的纳维亚依那普利协作生存研究II(CONSENSUS II)的结果。
N Engl J Med. 1992 Sep 3;327(10):678-84. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199209033271002.
8
Effect of antihypertensive agents on cardiovascular events in patients with coronary disease and normal blood pressure: the CAMELOT study: a randomized controlled trial.抗高血压药物对冠心病且血压正常患者心血管事件的影响:CAMELOT研究:一项随机对照试验
JAMA. 2004 Nov 10;292(18):2217-25. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.18.2217.
9
Comparison of the SF-36 health survey questionnaire with the Nottingham Health Profile in long-term survivors of a myocardial infarction.心肌梗死长期存活者中SF-36健康调查问卷与诺丁汉健康量表的比较。
J Public Health Med. 2000 Jun;22(2):167-75. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/22.2.167.
10
Effects of long-term enalapril therapy on cardiopulmonary exercise performance after myocardial infarction.长期依那普利治疗对心肌梗死后心肺运动功能的影响。
Circulation. 1991 Jun;83(6):1895-904. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.83.6.1895.

引用本文的文献

1
Physical distress is associated with cardiovascular events in a high risk population of elderly men.身体不适与老年男性高危人群的心血管事件相关。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2009 Mar 30;9:14. doi: 10.1186/1471-2261-9-14.
2
Antihypertensive treatment in elderly patients aged 75 years or over: a 24-week study of the tolerability of candesartan cilexetil in relation to hydrochlorothiazide.75岁及以上老年患者的抗高血压治疗:关于坎地沙坦酯与氢氯噻嗪耐受性的24周研究。
Drugs Aging. 2001;18(3):225-32. doi: 10.2165/00002512-200118030-00007.
3
Estimating the "avoidable" burden of disease by Disability Adjusted Life Years (DALYs).
通过伤残调整生命年(DALYs)估算疾病的“可避免”负担。
Health Care Manag Sci. 2000 Jan;3(1):9-21. doi: 10.1023/a:1019016702081.
4
A review of quality-of-life evaluations in patients with congestive heart failure.充血性心力衰竭患者生活质量评估综述。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1999 Sep;16(3):247-71. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199916030-00003.
5
Review of quality-of-life evaluations in patients with angina pectoris.心绞痛患者生活质量评估综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 1999 Aug;16(2):141-52. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199916020-00003.
6
Evaluating Health-related quality-of-life outcomes in patients with congestive heart failure. A review of recent randomised controlled trials.评估充血性心力衰竭患者与健康相关的生活质量结局。近期随机对照试验综述。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1999 Jan;15(1):19-46. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199915010-00003.