• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

员工医疗保健价值调查:第一轮。

The Employee Health Care Value Survey: round one.

作者信息

Allen H M, Darling H, McNeill D N, Bastien F

机构信息

Health Institute, New England Medical Center.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 1994 Fall;13(4):25-41. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.13.4.25.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.13.4.25
PMID:7989007
Abstract

In a groundbreaking arrangement, a consortium of large employers--the Xerox, GTE, and Digital Equipment Corporations--launched the Employee Health Care Value Survey during fall 1993. Completed by 24,306 employees, this survey was used to develop comparable methods for assessing corporate health care benefit strategies. It also enabled fair comparisons of thirty-two health plans across the country on more than sixty criteria. Variation in performance among plans was substantial, with managed care plans--particularly prepaid group practices and individual practice associations (IPAs)--recording the most favorable rankings on disenrollment, overall satisfaction, and other measures of "bottom-line performance." Variation in enrollees' health among plans was more modest, with indemnity enrollees posing a somewhat greater illness burden to their plans than enrollees of other plan types. The employers and evaluated health plans are now using the results for multiple purposes, including quality improvement initiatives, employee-based plan performance reports, employee contribution strategies, and health promotion programs.

摘要

1993年秋季,施乐公司、通用电话电子公司和数字设备公司等大型雇主组成的财团做出了一项开创性的安排,发起了员工医疗保健价值调查。这项调查由24306名员工完成,用于开发评估企业医疗保健福利策略的可比方法。它还能在60多个标准上对全国32种健康计划进行公平比较。各计划之间的绩效差异很大,管理式医疗计划——尤其是预付费团体医疗模式和个人执业协会(IPA)——在退保率、总体满意度和其他“底线绩效”指标上排名最靠前。各计划参保人员的健康差异较小,与其他类型计划的参保人员相比,赔偿型计划的参保人员给其计划带来的疾病负担略重。雇主和接受评估的健康计划现在正将这些结果用于多种目的,包括质量改进计划、基于员工的计划绩效报告、员工缴费策略和健康促进项目。

相似文献

1
The Employee Health Care Value Survey: round one.员工医疗保健价值调查:第一轮。
Health Aff (Millwood). 1994 Fall;13(4):25-41. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.13.4.25.
2
Anticipating market demand: tracking enrollee satisfaction and health over time.预测市场需求:长期跟踪参保人员的满意度和健康状况。
Int J Qual Health Care. 1998 Dec;10(6):521-30. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/10.6.521.
3
Private sector unlikely to follow Medicare lead in providing health plan disenrollment comparisons.
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2002 Mar;28(3):115-26. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(02)28011-6.
4
Chicago project provides insights into improving managed care.芝加哥项目为改善管理式医疗提供了见解。
Health Syst Lead. 1995 Aug-Sep;2(7):2-3.
5
The consumer health plan value survey: round two.消费者健康计划价值调查:第二轮
Health Aff (Millwood). 1997 Jul-Aug;16(4):156-66. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.16.4.156.
6
National quality monitoring of Medicare health plans: the relationship between enrollees' reports and the quality of clinical care.医疗保险健康计划的全国质量监测:参保者报告与临床护理质量之间的关系。
Med Care. 2001 Dec;39(12):1313-25. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200112000-00007.
7
HEDIS: implementation issues.
J Healthc Qual. 1996 Jan-Feb;18(1):32-4; quiz 34-5, 44. doi: 10.1111/j.1945-1474.1996.tb00821.x.
8
Big employers back new drive for comparable quality measures.大型雇主支持采用可比质量指标的新举措。
Manag Care. 1995 Oct;4(10):20-4.
9
Public sector employer evaluation of health plans in the United States.美国公共部门雇主对健康计划的评估。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 1998 Oct-Dec;13(4):259-75. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1751(199810/12)13:4<259::AID-HPM522>3.0.CO;2-W.
10
Multiple payers, commonality and free-riding in health care: Medicare and private payers.医疗保健中的多个支付方、共性与搭便车问题:医疗保险与私人支付方
J Health Econ. 2002 Nov;21(6):1049-69. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(02)00078-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Patients' satisfaction with primary health care centers services in kuwait city, kuwait.科威特城患者对科威特初级医疗保健中心服务的满意度
J Family Community Med. 2001 Sep;8(3):59-65.
2
No exit? The effect of health status on dissatisfaction and disenrollment from health plans.无路可退?健康状况对健康保险计划不满及退出的影响。
Health Serv Res. 1999 Jun;34(2):547-76.
3
Surveying consumer satisfaction to assess managed-care quality: current practices.调查消费者满意度以评估管理式医疗质量:当前做法。
Health Care Financ Rev. 1995 Summer;16(4):155-73.
4
A mental health program report card: a multidimensional approach to performance monitoring in public sector programs.一份心理健康项目成绩单:公共部门项目绩效监测的多维度方法。
Community Ment Health J. 1998 Feb;34(1):85-106. doi: 10.1023/a:1018720414126.
5
Variability in patient experiences at 15 New York City hospitals.纽约市15家医院患者体验的差异。
Bull N Y Acad Med. 1996 Winter;73(2):314-34.
6
Patient satisfaction in government health facilities in the state of Qatar.
J Community Health. 1996 Oct;21(5):349-58. doi: 10.1007/BF01702787.