• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

白人女性样本中面部吸引力的决定因素。

Determinants of facial attractiveness in a sample of white women.

作者信息

Michiels G, Sather A H

机构信息

Section of Orthodontics, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota.

出版信息

Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1994;9(2):95-103.

PMID:7989819
Abstract

Esthetic evaluation of a photographic profile slide of a random sample of 130 adult white women was made by six judges. The esthetic evaluation included vertical and anteroposterior evaluation and an attractiveness score on a visual analog scale. Additionally, the judges were asked to give specific reasons for their scores. Profiles with increased vertical features or convex or Class II tendency profiles were judged as being the most unattractive. Judgment of facial appearance was consistently related to certain regions of the face: the chin, upper lip, and nose having the greatest effect on the overall judgment of appearance. Orthodontic and surgical treatment planning should focus primarily on these regions to obtain the best esthetic result.

摘要

六位评委对130名成年白人女性随机样本的照片侧面幻灯片进行了美学评估。美学评估包括垂直和前后评估以及视觉模拟量表上的吸引力评分。此外,评委们还被要求给出评分的具体原因。具有增加的垂直特征或凸面或二类倾向侧面的被判定为最不具吸引力。对面部外观的判断始终与面部的某些区域相关:下巴、上唇和鼻子对整体外观判断的影响最大。正畸和外科治疗计划应主要关注这些区域以获得最佳美学效果。

相似文献

1
Determinants of facial attractiveness in a sample of white women.白人女性样本中面部吸引力的决定因素。
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1994;9(2):95-103.
2
The role of the divine proportion in the esthetic improvement of patients undergoing combined orthodontic/orthognathic surgical treatment.黄金比例在正畸/正颌联合手术治疗患者美学改善中的作用。
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 2001;16(2):108-20.
3
Facial aesthetics and the divine proportion: a comparison of surgical and non-surgical class II treatment.面部美学与黄金比例:手术与非手术治疗II类错颌畸形的比较
Aust Orthod J. 2004 Nov;20(2):51-63.
4
A comparison of providers' and consumers' perceptions of facial-profile attractiveness.提供者与消费者对面部轮廓吸引力认知的比较。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Dec;128(6):690-6; quiz 801. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.09.030.
5
Validity and reliability of facial profile evaluation in vertical and horizontal dimensions from lateral cephalograms and lateral photographs.从头颅侧位片和侧位照片评估面部轮廓在垂直和水平维度上的有效性和可靠性。
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1994;9(1):43-54.
6
[Study on perception of Shanghai population with labial profile].[上海人群唇部轮廓感知的研究]
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2003 Apr;12(2):99-102.
7
Symmetry, averageness, and feature size in the facial attractiveness of women.女性面部吸引力中的对称性、平均性和特征大小。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2004 Nov;117(3):313-32. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2004.07.002.
8
The influence of mandibular prominence on facial attractiveness.下颌突出度对面部吸引力的影响。
Eur J Orthod. 2005 Apr;27(2):129-33. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjh093.
9
Impact of facial components on the attractiveness of face: A perception-based study.面部组成部分对面部吸引力的影响:一项基于感知的研究。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2022 Nov;162(5):e218-e229. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2022.07.012. Epub 2022 Aug 26.
10
Attractiveness of facial profiles as rated by individuals with different levels of education.不同教育水平的个体对面部轮廓吸引力的评分。
J Orofac Orthop. 2008 Jan;69(1):20-30. doi: 10.1007/s00056-008-0735-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Which of the nine facial profiles according to AM Schwarz is the most (un)attractive?根据AM·施瓦茨的理论,九种面部轮廓中哪一种最具(不具)吸引力?
J Orofac Orthop. 2025 Apr 8. doi: 10.1007/s00056-025-00584-z.
2
Effectiveness and Safety of IPN-20-SENSE LIDOCAINE for Lip Volume Augmentation and/or Redefinition (SMILE Study): A Non-inferiority Randomized Double-Blinded Controlled Study.IPN-20-SENSE利多卡因用于唇部容积增大和/或重塑的有效性和安全性(SMILE研究):一项非劣效性随机双盲对照研究。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025 Feb;49(4):1033-1045. doi: 10.1007/s00266-024-04398-z. Epub 2024 Oct 14.
3
Comparision of profile macro-estethic perception among orthodontists, dentistry students, orthodontic patients and surgical orthodontic patients.
正畸医生、牙科学生、正畸患者及外科正畸患者的侧面宏观美学感知比较。
J Clin Exp Dent. 2020 Dec 1;12(12):e1109-e1116. doi: 10.4317/jced.57593. eCollection 2020 Dec.
4
Thresholds of Abnormality Perception in Facial Esthetics among Laypersons and Dental Professionals: Frontal Esthetics.非专业人士和牙科专业人员对面部美学中异常感知的阈值:正面美学
Int J Dent. 2020 Oct 17;2020:8946063. doi: 10.1155/2020/8946063. eCollection 2020.
5
Positional change in mandibular condyle in facial asymmetric patients after orthognathic surgery: cone-beam computed tomography study.正颌外科手术后面部不对称患者下颌髁突的位置变化:锥形束计算机断层扫描研究
Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Jun 25;40(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s40902-018-0152-6. eCollection 2018 Dec.
6
Facial esthetics and the assignment of personality traits before and after orthognathic surgery rated on video clips.通过视频片段对正颌手术前后的面部美学及人格特质赋值进行评估。
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 1;13(2):e0191718. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191718. eCollection 2018.
7
Three-dimensional analysis of upper airway morphology in skeletal Class III patients with and without mandibular asymmetry.骨性 III 类错颌伴或不伴下颌偏斜患者上气道形态的三维分析。
Angle Orthod. 2017 Jul;87(4):526-533. doi: 10.2319/120116-866.1. Epub 2017 Apr 18.
8
Assessment of objective and subjective measures as indicators for facial esthetics.评估客观和主观测量指标作为面部美学的指标。
J Forensic Dent Sci. 2016 Sep-Dec;8(3):139-144. doi: 10.4103/0975-1475.195107.
9
From Mimicry to Language: A Neuroanatomically Based Evolutionary Model of the Emergence of Vocal Language.从模仿到语言:基于神经解剖学的有声语言出现的进化模型
Front Neurosci. 2016 Jun 30;10:307. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2016.00307. eCollection 2016.
10
Oral health-related quality of life after orthodontic treatment for anterior tooth alignment: Association with emotional state and sociodemographic factors.前牙排齐正畸治疗后的口腔健康相关生活质量:与情绪状态及社会人口学因素的关联
J Orofac Orthop. 2016 Mar;77(2):138-45. doi: 10.1007/s00056-016-0018-4. Epub 2016 Feb 29.