• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[非典型子宫内膜增生:刮宫组织病理诊断的特点]

[Atypical endometrial hyperplasia: characteristics of histopathological diagnosis in curettings].

作者信息

Roa J C, Chuaqui R, Le Cerf P

机构信息

Departamento de Anatomía Patológica, Escuela de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile.

出版信息

Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol. 1993;58(5):388-92.

PMID:7991860
Abstract

The frequency of Hendrickson's and Kurman's criteria for the diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma was analyzed in 25 cases of endometrial curettings in which the diagnosis of atypical hyperplasia was made. All cases had subsequent hysterectomies not showing carcinoma. Hendrickson's cytologic elements were found in 88% of the cases and architectural elements in 84% of the cases. Kurman's architectural elements were not found. In only one case stromal desmoplasia was present; 3 cases (12%) showed small cribes, all of them in tiny foci less than 0.5 mm. Small glands were present in 76% of the cases. Hendrickson's cytological and architectural criteria are not specific for carcinoma; they are frequently found in atypical hyperplasias. Kurman's criteria are absent in endometrial hyperplasias. Most cases of endometrial atypical hyperplasia do not show small cribes; when the latter are present, they are only focally found and measure less than 0.5 mm.

摘要

对25例诊断为非典型增生的子宫内膜刮除术病例分析了亨德里克森(Hendrickson)和库尔曼(Kurman)诊断子宫内膜癌标准的出现频率。所有病例随后均进行了子宫切除术,结果未发现癌变。在88%的病例中发现了亨德里克森的细胞学特征,在84%的病例中发现了其结构特征。未发现库尔曼的结构特征。仅1例存在间质纤维组织增生;3例(12%)显示有小筛状结构,均存在于小于0.5毫米的微小病灶中。76%的病例中有小腺体。亨德里克森的细胞学和结构标准并非癌所特有;它们在非典型增生中经常出现。子宫内膜增生中不存在库尔曼的标准。大多数子宫内膜非典型增生病例未显示小筛状结构;当出现小筛状结构时,仅局灶性存在且大小小于0.5毫米。

相似文献

1
[Atypical endometrial hyperplasia: characteristics of histopathological diagnosis in curettings].[非典型子宫内膜增生:刮宫组织病理诊断的特点]
Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol. 1993;58(5):388-92.
2
The value of curettage in diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia.刮宫术在子宫内膜增生诊断中的价值。
Gynecol Oncol. 2002 Jan;84(1):135-9. doi: 10.1006/gyno.2001.6476.
3
Cellular features of endometrial hyperplasia and well differentiated adenocarcinoma using the Endocyte sampler: Diagnostic criteria based on the cytoarchitecture of tissue fragments.使用Endocyte采样器对子宫内膜增生和高分化腺癌的细胞特征:基于组织碎片细胞结构的诊断标准
Cancer. 2006 Apr 25;108(2):77-85. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21734.
4
Endometrial glandular and stromal breakdown, part 1: cytomorphological appearance.子宫内膜腺体和间质崩解,第1部分:细胞形态学表现
Diagn Cytopathol. 2006 Sep;34(9):609-13. doi: 10.1002/dc.20524.
5
The diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia on curettage: how reliable is it?刮宫诊断子宫内膜增生:其可靠性如何?
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009 Apr;279(4):489-92. doi: 10.1007/s00404-008-0749-6. Epub 2008 Aug 5.
6
Differential diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia and carcinoma by computerized image cytometry of cell proliferation, apoptosis and Bcl-2 expression.通过细胞增殖、凋亡及Bcl-2表达的计算机图像细胞术对子宫内膜增生和癌进行鉴别诊断。
Ann Clin Lab Sci. 1999 Oct-Dec;29(4):308-15.
7
Histopathologic consistency between endometrial hyperplasia diagnosis from endometrial curettage and pathologic diagnoses from hysterectomy specimens.经子宫内膜刮宫术诊断的子宫内膜增生与子宫切除标本的病理诊断之间的组织病理学一致性。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2005 Oct;88 Suppl 2:S16-21.
8
Microcarcinoma of the endometrium: a mapping study with special reference to cytologic atypia in the endometrium.子宫内膜微小癌:一项特别关注子宫内膜细胞非典型性的图谱研究。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 1992 Dec;22(6):400-5.
9
[The relationship between simple and atypical endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial carcinoma].[单纯性与不典型子宫内膜增生和子宫内膜癌之间的关系]
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia). 1996;35(4):18-20.
10
[Outcome analysis of conservative treatment of well-differentiated endometrial adenocarcinoma and severe atypical hyperplasia in young women].[年轻女性高分化子宫内膜腺癌及重度非典型增生保守治疗的疗效分析]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2006 Apr;41(4):242-5.