Kocjan T, van Mastrigt R
Faculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Ljubljana, Slovenija.
Urol Res. 1994;22(3):137-41. doi: 10.1007/BF00571839.
Several different techniques for urodynamic signal compression have been proposed in the last few years. Using these techniques it is possible to reduce the requirements for digital storage or transmission. There are a number of applications where it is essential to use such techniques in diagnostic and ambulatory urodynamics. The purpose of this study is to compare different techniques of urodynamic data compression. The so-called FAN, voltage triggered, two point projection and second difference methods. The comparison between the methods is based on 65 pressure, 46 uroflow and 18 surface electromyogram signals. The reduction ratio achieved for different allowable errors between the original and compressed signals is calculated and compared for the different techniques. Results show that it is possible to store urodynamic signals accurately at a low sampling rate, where FAN and voltage triggered methods seem to be superior to the rest.
在过去几年里,已经提出了几种不同的尿动力学信号压缩技术。使用这些技术可以降低数字存储或传输的要求。在诊断性和动态尿动力学中有许多应用场合,使用此类技术至关重要。本研究的目的是比较尿动力学数据压缩的不同技术。即所谓的FAN、电压触发、两点投影和二次差分法。这些方法之间的比较基于65个压力信号、46个尿流信号和18个表面肌电图信号。针对原始信号与压缩信号之间不同的允许误差,计算并比较了不同技术所实现的压缩率。结果表明,以低采样率准确存储尿动力学信号是可行的,其中FAN和电压触发方法似乎优于其他方法。