Kirkorian G, Moncada E, Chevalier P, Canu G, Claudel J P, Bellon C, Lyon L, Touboul P
Hospital Cardiovasculaire et Pneumologique Louis Pradel, Lyon, France.
Circulation. 1994 Dec;90(6):2804-14. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.90.6.2804.
Previous reports have shown that radiofrequency ablation can terminate atrial flutter and prevent recurrences. However, different methods have been used, and the current experience remains limited. The objective of the present study was to determine the efficacy of radiofrequency ablation of atrial tissue in patients with atrial flutter using an anatomically guided approach.
We treated 22 patients aged 30 to 73 years. Atrial flutter was recurrent for a mean of 5 years despite the administration of multiple antiarrhythmic drugs. Radiofrequency current was directed to the atrial isthmus between the inferior vena cava and the tricuspid ring, regardless of the morphology of local electrograms. Radiofrequency energy was applied during typical atrial flutter in 12 patients, atypical atrial flutter in 2 patients, and successively both forms in 8 patients. In 19 patients, atrial flutter abruptly terminated. In 3 patients, atrial flutter persisted despite 37, 48, and 25 applications, respectively. Atrial recordings demonstrated that atrial flutter termination occurred as a consequence of conduction block at the site of radiofrequency energy application, regardless of the type of atrial flutter. The number of applications before termination ranged from 1 to 82 (mean, 32). Atrial flutter could no longer be induced in every case. There were no complications. During a 13-month mean follow-up, atrial flutter recurred in only 2 of the 19 patients who had a successful ablation. Four patients experienced chronic atrial fibrillation, and 2 of them returned to sinus rhythm with antiarrhythmic therapy.
Radiofrequency ablation of atrial flutter using anatomic guidance is feasible and effective. Further experience is needed to delineate its role as an alternative approach to the management of refractory atrial flutter.
既往报道显示,射频消融可终止心房扑动并预防复发。然而,所采用的方法各异,且目前的经验仍然有限。本研究的目的是确定采用解剖学引导方法对心房扑动患者进行心房组织射频消融的疗效。
我们治疗了22例年龄在30至73岁之间的患者。尽管使用了多种抗心律失常药物,但心房扑动平均复发5年。无论局部心电图形态如何,射频电流均指向腔静脉与三尖瓣环之间的心房峡部。12例患者在典型心房扑动时施加射频能量,2例患者在非典型心房扑动时施加射频能量,8例患者先后对两种类型的心房扑动施加射频能量。19例患者的心房扑动突然终止。3例患者尽管分别进行了37次、48次和25次射频能量施加,心房扑动仍持续存在。心房记录显示,无论心房扑动的类型如何,心房扑动的终止均是由于在射频能量施加部位出现传导阻滞所致。终止前的施加次数为1至82次(平均32次)。并非所有病例均能再次诱发心房扑动。未出现并发症。在平均13个月的随访期间,19例消融成功的患者中仅有2例心房扑动复发。4例患者发生慢性心房颤动,其中2例通过抗心律失常治疗恢复为窦性心律。
采用解剖学引导进行心房扑动的射频消融是可行且有效的。需要进一步积累经验以明确其作为难治性心房扑动治疗替代方法的作用。