• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[胰十二指肠切除术治疗十二指肠乳头导管腺癌的根治性治疗风险]

[Risks of radical treatment in pylorus preserving duodenopancreatectomy in ductal carcinoma].

作者信息

Heise J W, Becker H, Borchard F, Röher H D

机构信息

Klinik für Allgemeine und Unfallchirurgie, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf.

出版信息

Chirurg. 1994 Sep;65(9):780-4.

PMID:7995086
Abstract

Between 1986 and 1993 fifty-two patients with ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head underwent pancreatoduodenectomy, 34 in a standard Whipple technique (Whipple), 18 since 1990 preserving the pylorus (PPPD). Operating time was significantly longer for Whipple compared to PPPD (5.5 +/- 1.4 vs. 3.8 +/- 1.0; p < 0.01). Postoperative morbidity (32 vs. 56%) resulted to 50% after PPPD of early postoperative delayed gastric emptying. Hospital mortality was 6% vs. none, respectively. Histopathologic workup of 28 node positive Whipple specimens revealed node involvement in only 11% along the stomach (1) or the pyloric region (2), but in these cases tumors had obviously close relation to the gastric outlet as the reason to chose Whipple. Actuarial survival was very similar in both groups, being 41 vs. 53% at one year, 13 vs. 18% at two years, and only 3.3% at five years for the whole cohort. In conclusion distal gastric resection in Whipple's procedure in ductal carcinoma is oncologically not effective. There is no hazard for survival relating to the preservation of the pylorus. Therefore PPPD as the technically less expensive and for nutritional status more beneficial operation should be the procedure of choice also for this type of tumor.

摘要

1986年至1993年间,52例胰头导管腺癌患者接受了胰十二指肠切除术,其中34例采用标准的惠普尔手术(Whipple),18例自1990年起采用保留幽门的手术(PPPD)。与PPPD相比,Whipple手术时间明显更长(5.5±1.4小时对3.8±1.0小时;p<0.01)。PPPD术后早期胃排空延迟导致术后发病率为50%(分别为32%和56%)。医院死亡率分别为6%和0%。对28例Whipple手术标本淋巴结阳性的组织病理学检查显示,仅11%的病例沿胃(1例)或幽门区域(2例)有淋巴结受累,但在这些病例中,肿瘤与胃出口明显关系密切,这是选择Whipple手术的原因。两组的精算生存率非常相似,整个队列一年时分别为41%和53%,两年时为13%和18%,五年时仅为3.3%。总之,在导管癌的Whipple手术中进行远端胃切除在肿瘤学上无效。保留幽门对生存没有危害。因此,PPPD作为技术上成本较低且对营养状况更有益的手术,也应成为这类肿瘤的首选手术方式。

相似文献

1
[Risks of radical treatment in pylorus preserving duodenopancreatectomy in ductal carcinoma].[胰十二指肠切除术治疗十二指肠乳头导管腺癌的根治性治疗风险]
Chirurg. 1994 Sep;65(9):780-4.
2
Pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic head carcinoma with or without pylorus preservation.保留或不保留幽门的胰十二指肠切除术治疗胰头癌
Hepatogastroenterology. 2001 Sep-Oct;48(41):1479-85.
3
Results of a pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer: a comparison with results of the Whipple procedure.胰腺癌保留幽门胰十二指肠切除术的结果:与惠普尔手术结果的比较。
Hepatogastroenterology. 1997 Nov-Dec;44(18):1536-40.
4
[Oncologic risk in pylorus preservation in resection of ductal pancreas carcinoma].[胰管腺癌切除术中保留幽门的肿瘤学风险]
Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd. 1997;114:1087-9.
5
Pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic head cancer: PPPD versus Whipple procedure.胰头癌的胰十二指肠切除术:保留幽门的胰十二指肠切除术与惠普尔手术对比
Hepatogastroenterology. 2005 Sep-Oct;52(65):1601-4.
6
[Surgical technique and outcome in pancreatic carcinoma].[胰腺癌的手术技术与治疗结果]
Praxis (Bern 1994). 2000 Nov 30;89(48):2003-10.
7
Prospective randomized comparison between pylorus-preserving and standard pancreaticoduodenectomy.保留幽门的胰十二指肠切除术与标准胰十二指肠切除术的前瞻性随机对照研究。
Br J Surg. 1999 May;86(5):603-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.01074.x.
8
Standard whipple's operation versus pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy: a randomized controlled trial study.标准惠普尔手术与保留幽门的胰十二指肠切除术:一项随机对照试验研究。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2008 May;91(5):693-8.
9
Pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy with Billroth I type reconstruction: a viable option for pancreatic head resection.保留幽门的胰十二指肠切除术并Billroth I式重建:胰头切除的一种可行选择。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2002;9(5):614-9. doi: 10.1007/s005340200083.
10
Pancreatic head resection with segmental duodenectomy: safety and long-term results.胰头切除联合十二指肠节段切除术:安全性及长期结果
Ann Surg. 2007 Dec;246(6):923-8; discussion 929-31. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31815c2a14.

引用本文的文献

1
Intraoperative Schnellschnittuntersuchungen parapylorischer Lymphknoten bei der pyloruserhaltenden Pankreaskopfresektion: Gibt es eine klinische Relevanz?保留幽门的胰头切除术术中对幽门旁淋巴结的快速切片检查:有临床意义吗?
Viszeralmedizin. 2014 Feb;30(1):61-4. doi: 10.1159/000358773.
2
Pancreatic resection for pancreatic cancer.胰腺癌的胰腺切除术
HPB (Oxford). 2006;8(5):346-51. doi: 10.1080/13651820600803981.
3
Is delayed gastric emptying so terrible after pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy? Prevention and management.
保留幽门的胰十二指肠切除术后胃排空延迟就那么可怕吗?预防与处理。
World J Gastroenterol. 2006 Oct 21;12(39):6382-5. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i39.6382.
4
[Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors after resection of ductal pancreatic carcinomas].[导管腺癌切除术后预后因素的多变量分析]
Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1995;380(3):133-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00207717.