Burt F J, Leman P A, Abbott J C, Swanepoel R
Department of Virology, University of the Witwatersrand, Republic of South Africa.
Epidemiol Infect. 1994 Dec;113(3):551-62. doi: 10.1017/s0950268800068576.
Several methods for demonstrating antibody to Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever virus were compared on serum samples taken from 101 patients during the acute stage of illness and at intervals for up to 59 months thereafter, with emphasis on early detection of the immune response. The deaths of 23 patients on days 5-14 of illness were ascribed to the effects of the disease; two patients died later from other causes. Very few of the patients who died from the acute illness mounted an antibody response detectable by the methods tested. Four patients who died and 18 who recovered were treated with immune plasma collected from recovered patients. Treated patients acquired IgG antibody from the plasma, but it was possible to discern the onset of an endogenous IgM response in those individuals who survived the disease by all of the methods tested. Indirect immunofluorescence (IF) tests detected IgM and/or IgG antibodies at the earliest on day 4 of illness in about 10% of patients who survived the disease, and by day 9 all survivors had antibodies demonstrable by IF. A biotin-streptavidin IF technique offered no advantage over the standard IF test for the early detection of IgG antibody, but demonstrated higher antibody titres and detected IgM antibody earlier in about a quarter of the patients tested. An IgM-capture enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA) and an IgG sandwich ELISA demonstrated higher antibody titres than did IF tests, and detected antibody responses at an earlier stage of infection than did IF tests in about one-fifth of patients, but the reverse was true in a similar proportion of instances. A competition ELISA, which detected total antibody activity, produced lower titres than did the IgM and IgG ELISAs, but yielded results which were in close agreement with the findings in IF tests. It was concluded that the IF tests were most convenient for use in making a rapid serodiagnosis of the disease.
对从101例患者急性期采集的血清样本以及此后长达59个月期间每隔一段时间采集的样本,比较了几种检测克里米亚-刚果出血热病毒抗体的方法,重点是早期检测免疫反应。23例患者在发病第5 - 14天死亡归因于该疾病的影响;另有2例患者后来死于其他原因。死于急性疾病的患者中,很少有人通过所测试的方法产生可检测到的抗体反应。4例死亡患者和18例康复患者接受了从康复患者采集的免疫血浆治疗。接受治疗的患者从血浆中获得了IgG抗体,但通过所有测试方法都有可能辨别出那些在疾病中存活下来的个体内源性IgM反应的开始。间接免疫荧光(IF)试验最早在发病第4天在约10%存活的患者中检测到IgM和/或IgG抗体,到第9天所有存活者的抗体均可通过IF检测到。生物素-链霉亲和素IF技术在早期检测IgG抗体方面并不比标准IF试验更具优势,但在约四分之一的受测患者中显示出更高的抗体滴度且更早检测到IgM抗体。IgM捕获酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)和IgG夹心ELISA显示出比IF试验更高的抗体滴度,并且在约五分之一的患者中比IF试验在感染的更早阶段检测到抗体反应,但在类似比例的情况下结果相反。检测总抗体活性的竞争ELISA产生的滴度低于IgM和IgG ELISA,但结果与IF试验的结果密切一致。得出的结论是,IF试验最便于用于对该疾病进行快速血清学诊断。