Dewhurst D G, Hardcastle J, Hardcastle P T, Stuart E
Faculty of Health and Social Care, Leeds Metropolitan University, United Kingdom.
Am J Physiol. 1994 Dec;267(6 Pt 3):S95-104. doi: 10.1152/advances.1994.267.6.S95.
Here we describe an evaluation of the effectiveness, compared with a traditional laboratory, of an interactive computer-assisted learning (CAL) program, which simulates a series of experiments performed using isolated, everted sacs of rat small intestine. The program is aimed at undergraduate students of physiology and is designed to offer an alternative student-centered learning approach to the traditional laboratory-based practical class. The evaluative study compared two groups of second-year undergraduate students studying a module on epithelial transport: one group worked independently using the CAL program and associated learning materials, and the other group followed a conventional practical class approach, working in the laboratory under supervision. Knowledge gain of each group was measured by means of a test consisting of a range of question types (e.g., short-answer factual, calculation, interpretation) given to students before and after the module. Student attitude to both approaches was assessed by questionnaire, and the resource requirements were also compared. It was found that the knowledge gain of both groups of students was the same, that students had a positive attitude toward using CAL programs of this type, and that the cost of the conventional laboratory-based approach was five times greater. The potential for integrating CAL programs into the undergraduate curriculum is discussed.
在此,我们描述了一项针对交互式计算机辅助学习(CAL)程序有效性的评估,该评估将其与传统实验室进行了比较。该程序模拟了一系列使用大鼠小肠离体翻囊进行的实验。该程序针对生理学专业的本科生,旨在为传统的基于实验室的实践课程提供一种以学生为中心的替代学习方法。评估研究比较了两组学习上皮运输模块的二年级本科生:一组独立使用CAL程序及相关学习材料,另一组采用传统实践课程方法,在实验室接受监督进行学习。通过在该模块前后向学生提供包含一系列问题类型(例如,简答题、计算题、解释题)的测试来衡量每组学生的知识增益。通过问卷调查评估学生对这两种方法的态度,并比较资源需求。结果发现,两组学生的知识增益相同,学生对使用此类CAL程序持积极态度,且传统基于实验室方法的成本高出五倍。文中还讨论了将CAL程序整合到本科课程中的潜力。