Petto Andrew, Fredin Zachary, Burdo Joseph
Departments of Biological Sciences and Kinesiology, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI.
NeuroTinker, Minneapolis, MN.
J Undergrad Neurosci Educ. 2017 Jun 15;15(2):A151-A156. eCollection 2017 Spring.
During the spring of 2016 at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, we implemented a novel educational technology designed to teach undergraduates about the nervous system while allowing them to physically construct their own neural circuits. Modular, electronic neuron simulators called NeuroBytes were used by the students in BIOSCI202 Anatomy and Physiology I, a four-credit course consisting of three hours per week each of lecture and laboratory time. 162 students participated in the laboratory sessions that covered reflexes; 83 in the experimental sections used the NeuroBytes to build a model of the patellar tendon reflex, while 79 in the control sections participated in alternate reflex curricula. To address the question of whether or not the NeuroBytes-based patellar tendon reflex simulation brought about learning gains, the control and experimental group students underwent pre/post testing before and after their laboratory sections. We found that for several of the neuroscience and physiology concepts assessed on the test, the experimental group students had significantly greater declarative learning gains between the pre- and post-test as compared to the control group students. While there are numerous virtual neuroscience education tools available to undergraduate educators, there are relatively few designed to engage students in the basics of electrophysiology and neural circuitry using physical manipulatives, and none to our knowledge that allow them to build circuits from functioning hand-held "neurons."
2016年春季,在威斯康星大学密尔沃基分校,我们实施了一项新颖的教育技术,旨在教授本科生有关神经系统的知识,同时让他们亲自构建自己的神经回路。BIOSCI202解剖学与生理学I这门四学分课程的学生使用了名为NeuroBytes的模块化电子神经元模拟器,该课程每周有三小时的讲座时间和三小时的实验时间。162名学生参加了涵盖反射内容的实验课程;83名学生在实验部分使用NeuroBytes构建了髌腱反射模型,而79名对照组学生参加了其他反射课程。为了解决基于NeuroBytes的髌腱反射模拟是否带来学习收获的问题,对照组和实验组的学生在实验课程前后都进行了测试。我们发现,在测试中评估的几个神经科学和生理学概念方面,实验组学生在测试前后的陈述性学习收获明显大于对照组学生。虽然本科教育工作者可以使用众多虚拟神经科学教育工具,但专门设计用于让学生通过物理操作参与电生理学和神经回路基础知识学习的工具相对较少,据我们所知,没有任何工具能让他们用可正常工作的手持“神经元”构建电路。