Würtemberger G, Müller S, Matthys H, Sokolov I
Medical University Hospital, Dept of Pneumology, Freiburg, Germany.
Monaldi Arch Chest Dis. 1994 Sep;49(4):348-53.
9 pulse oximeters (BIOX-III, Nellcor 250, Jaeger CNS, Micro2), Pulsox-8, Oxycount, PulsOXImeter, PalcoLabs and Pulsox-7) were studied in 90 COPD patients. The transcutaneus oxygen saturation (SaO2%) was compared with arterial oxygen saturation calculated simultaneously with drawn blood samples (AVL-995). The measurement of error distribution and the cumulative distribution function (CDF) of measurement errors allows ranking of the pulse oximeters, which can be divided in 3 groups. We conclude that the accuracy of the tested nine pulse oximeter does not enable precise absolute measurements, specially at lower oxygen saturation ranges.
对9种脉搏血氧仪(BIOX - III、Nellcor 250、Jaeger CNS、Micro2、Pulsox - 8、Oxycount、PulsOXImeter、PalcoLabs和Pulsox - 7)在90例慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者中进行了研究。将经皮血氧饱和度(SaO2%)与通过采集血样同时计算得出的动脉血氧饱和度(AVL - 995)进行比较。测量误差分布以及测量误差的累积分布函数(CDF)可对脉搏血氧仪进行排名,这些脉搏血氧仪可分为3组。我们得出结论,所测试的9种脉搏血氧仪的准确性无法进行精确的绝对测量,特别是在较低的血氧饱和度范围内。