• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[临床焦虑症研究中测量工具的使用建议]

[Recommendations for the use of measuring instruments in clinical anxiety research].

作者信息

Bandelow B, Margraf J

机构信息

Psychiatrische Universitätsklinik Göttingen.

出版信息

Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 1994 Oct;62(10):361-5. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-999068.

DOI:10.1055/s-2007-999068
PMID:8001892
Abstract

The Arbeitskreis Angstforschung (AKA) brings together investigators active in the field of anxiety research and representatives of anxiety disorder outpatient clinics in German speaking countries. During its regular meetings, the decision was made to develop recommendations for the assessment of anxiety disorder patients in clinical studies. A task force of experts in pharmacological and psychotherapeutic treatments established a consensus of opinion to improve standardisation and comparability of studies originating from different centres. The AKA specifically recommends the following set of variables to be collected in all studies: (1) Demographic data: age, gender, marital status, education, employment, and living situation. (2) DIAGNOSIS: diagnoses should be obtained by clinically experienced personnel with special training in the particular assessment instruments. Structured interviews, according to the current versions of the DSM or ICD classifications are recommended. Published reliability and validity data should be available for the interviews. Examples of specific instruments meeting these criteria are given. (3) Symptoms and course: Data on the course of the disorder should cover onset, type of course, timing of episodes, currently active or in remission, as well as a complete treatment history. In addition, patient self-ratings and observer ratings should be obtained in order to allow comparisons across studies, assess the severity and measure treatment outcome. (4) Disability and restrictions in quality of life: these variables should be assessed by rating scales covering work, social and leisure activities, and family relationships. The AKA expects that these recommendations will be helpful to clinical anxiety researchers. Acceptance of common standards should improve the quality and comparability of pharmacological and psychotherapeutic studies in the complex field of anxiety disorders.

摘要

焦虑症研究工作组(AKA)汇聚了活跃于焦虑症研究领域的研究人员以及德语国家焦虑症门诊诊所的代表。在其定期会议期间,做出了为临床研究中焦虑症患者评估制定建议的决定。一个由药物治疗和心理治疗专家组成的特别工作组达成了共识,以提高来自不同中心的研究的标准化和可比性。AKA特别建议在所有研究中收集以下一组变量:(1)人口统计学数据:年龄、性别、婚姻状况、教育程度、就业情况和生活状况。(2)诊断:诊断应由在特定评估工具方面接受过专门培训的临床经验丰富的人员进行。建议根据DSM或ICD分类的当前版本进行结构化访谈。访谈应具备已发表的信度和效度数据。给出了符合这些标准的特定工具的示例。(3)症状与病程:关于疾病病程的数据应涵盖起病、病程类型、发作时间、当前是否活跃或缓解,以及完整的治疗史。此外,应获取患者自评和观察者评分,以便进行跨研究比较、评估严重程度并衡量治疗结果。(4)残疾与生活质量受限:这些变量应通过涵盖工作、社交和休闲活动以及家庭关系的评定量表进行评估。AKA期望这些建议对临床焦虑症研究人员有所帮助。采用共同标准应能提高焦虑症这一复杂领域中药物治疗和心理治疗研究的质量和可比性。

相似文献

1
[Recommendations for the use of measuring instruments in clinical anxiety research].[临床焦虑症研究中测量工具的使用建议]
Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 1994 Oct;62(10):361-5. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-999068.
2
[The German version of the "Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders" (SCARED): parent- and self report in a clinical sample].["儿童焦虑相关情绪障碍筛查量表(SCARED)德语版:临床样本中的家长报告与自我报告"]
Prax Kinderpsychol Kinderpsychiatr. 2011;60(10):820-34. doi: 10.13109/prkk.2011.60.10.820.
3
ECNP consensus meeting. Bipolar depression. Nice, March 2007.欧洲神经精神药理学会共识会议。双相抑郁症。英国尼斯,2007年3月。
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2008 Jul;18(7):535-49. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2008.03.003. Epub 2008 May 23.
4
The rating and self-rating of anxiety.焦虑的评分与自评
Br J Psychiatry Suppl. 1991 Sep(12):15-22.
5
Reliability and validity of the Coolidge Axis II Inventory: a new inventory for the assessment of personality disorders.《柯立芝轴II量表的信效度:一种用于评估人格障碍的新量表》
J Pers Assess. 1992 Oct;59(2):223-38. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5902_1.
6
Measurement of anxiety and depression in children and adolescents.儿童和青少年焦虑与抑郁的测量。
Psychiatr Clin North Am. 1989 Dec;12(4):837-60.
7
[Assessment of depressive disorders].[抑郁症评估]
Ther Umsch. 2010 Nov;67(11):549-53. doi: 10.1024/0040-5930/a000093.
8
[Evaluation of worry: validation of a French translation of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire].[担忧评估:宾夕法尼亚州立大学担忧问卷法语翻译版的效度验证]
Encephale. 2001 Sep-Oct;27(5):475-84.
9
[Anxiety disorders in private practice psychiatric out-patients: prevalence, comorbidity and burden (DELTA study)].[私人执业精神科门诊患者中的焦虑症:患病率、共病情况及负担(DELTA研究)]
Encephale. 2002 Nov-Dec;28(6 Pt 1):510-9.
10
Validity of prototype diagnosis for mood and anxiety disorders.原型诊断在心境和焦虑障碍中的有效性。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2013 Feb;70(2):140-8. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.270.