Suppr超能文献

人类第一背侧骨间肌及其尺神经拮抗肌的食指位置和力量

Index finger position and force of the human first dorsal interosseus and its ulnar nerve antagonist.

作者信息

Zijdewind I, Kernell D

机构信息

Department of Neurophysiology, Graduate School of Neurosciences, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Appl Physiol (1985). 1994 Aug;77(2):987-97. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1994.77.2.987.

Abstract

In normal subjects, maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) and electrical ulnar nerve stimulation (UNS; 30-Hz bursts of 0.33 s) were systematically compared with regard to the forces generated in different directions (abduction/adduction and flexion) and at different degrees of index finger abduction. With a "resting" hand position in which there was no index finger abduction, UNS produced about one-half of the abduction force elicited by an MVC (mean ratio 51%). Qualitatively, such a discrepancy would be expected, because UNS activates two index finger muscles with opposing actions in the abduction/adduction plane of torques: the first dorsal interosseus (FDI) and the first palmar interosseus (FPI). The abduction forces produced by MVC and UNS were very sensitive to index finger abduction angle: at a maximum degree of abduction, the UNS-generated force even reversed its direction of action to adduction (with FPI dominating) and the abduction MVC declined to 37% of that in the resting hand position. Inasmuch as these declines in MVC- and UNS-generated abduction force could not be explained by a change in moment arm, the main alternative seemed to be abduction-associated alterations in FDI fiber length (analysis by previously published biomechanical data). The FDI and FPI were further compared by application of a UNS-generated fatigue test (5-min burst stimulation), with the index finger kept at a "neutral" angle, i.e., the abduction angle at which, in the unfatigued state, the forces of the FDI and FPI were in balance (zero net UNS-generated abduction/adduction force).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

在正常受试者中,系统比较了最大自主收缩(MVC)和尺神经电刺激(UNS;0.33秒的30赫兹脉冲串)在不同方向(外展/内收和屈曲)以及食指不同外展程度下产生的力量。在食指无外展的“休息”手部位置,UNS产生的外展力约为MVC诱发外展力的一半(平均比值51%)。从定性角度看,这种差异是可以预期的,因为UNS激活了在扭矩外展/内收平面具有相反作用的两块食指肌肉:第一背侧骨间肌(FDI)和第一掌侧骨间肌(FPI)。MVC和UNS产生的外展力对食指外展角度非常敏感:在最大外展程度时,UNS产生的力甚至改变其作用方向为内收(FPI占主导),且外展MVC降至休息手部位置时的37%。由于MVC和UNS产生的外展力下降无法用力臂变化来解释,主要的替代解释似乎是FDI纤维长度与外展相关的改变(根据先前发表的生物力学数据分析)。通过应用UNS产生的疲劳测试(5分钟脉冲刺激)进一步比较FDI和FPI,食指保持在“中性”角度,即在未疲劳状态下FDI和FPI的力量平衡(UNS产生的外展/内收净力为零)的外展角度。(摘要截短于250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验