Battista G W, Petrone D M
J Clin Dent. 1993;4(3):85-7.
The Colgate Rippled Bristles toothbrush was compared to the Oral-B 40 toothbrush using a laboratory device which simulates horizontal and vertical brushing movements under pressures of 250, 500 and 750 grams. Interproximal access was determined by measuring the width of the brushing stroke on pressure-sensitive paper surrounding anterior or posterior tooth shapes. The Colgate Rippled toothbrush was consistently superior to the Oral-B 40 toothbrush in accomplishing interproximal access in the laboratory tests performed here. On anterior-shaped teeth, the superiority (p < 0.05-0.01) was evident at all pressures tested, with both horizontal and vertical brushing movements. On posterior tooth shapes the Colgate Rippled toothbrush was superior (p < 0.01) to the Oral-B 40 toothbrush at all brushing weights and with both vertical and horizontal motions. When total interproximal access efficacy means were calculated for all brushing weights, the Colgate Rippled toothbrush was superior (p < 0.05-0.01) to the Oral-B 40 toothbrush on both anterior and posterior tooth shapes in the vertical and horizontal brushing motions.
使用一种实验室设备，将高露洁波纹刷毛牙刷与欧乐B 40牙刷进行比较，该设备可在250克、500克和750克压力下模拟水平和垂直刷牙动作。通过测量围绕前牙或后牙形状的压敏纸上刷牙行程的宽度来确定牙间隙清洁效果。在此进行的实验室测试中，高露洁波纹牙刷在实现牙间隙清洁方面始终优于欧乐B 40牙刷。在前牙形状上，在所有测试压力下，无论是水平还是垂直刷牙动作，其优势均明显（p < 0.05 - 0.01）。在所有刷牙重量下，无论是垂直还是水平动作，对于后牙形状，高露洁波纹牙刷均优于欧乐B 40牙刷（p < 0.01）。当计算所有刷牙重量下的总牙间隙清洁效果平均值时，在垂直和水平刷牙动作中，高露洁波纹牙刷在前牙和后牙形状上均优于欧乐B 40牙刷（p < 0.05 - 0.01）。
