• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两款紧凑型手动牙刷的实验室邻面清洁效果

Laboratory interproximal access efficacy of two compact manual toothbrushes.

作者信息

Yankell S L, Shi X, Emling R C

机构信息

University of Pennsylvania School of Dental Medicine, Philadelphia.

出版信息

J Clin Dent. 1994;4(4):111-3.

PMID:8031478
Abstract

The Colgate Precision Compact, soft texture toothbrush and the Oral-B 35 toothbrush were compared using a laboratory device designed to simulate clinical toothbrushing motions and pressures. The toothbrushing time was sixty seconds for each vertical or horizontal toothbrushing sequence, for each of the three brushing weights tested (250, 500 or 750 g). Interproximal access efficacy (IAE) was determined by measuring the maximum width of the brushing stroke on pressure-sensitive paper placed around simulated anterior or posterior teeth. Twenty-four toothbrushes of each design were evaluated for each toothbrushing motion, tooth shape and toothbrushing weight. Using the vertical toothbrushing motion on anterior teeth, IAE means for the Colgate Precision Compact toothbrush were significantly higher (p < 0.001) than the Oral-B 35 toothbrush at 250 and 750 g of brushing weight. With vertical toothbrushing across posterior-shaped teeth, IAE values for the Colgate Precision Compact toothbrush were significantly higher (p < 0.001) than the Oral-B 35 toothbrush at each of the 250, 500 and 750 g brushing weights tested. With horizontal toothbrushing motions, the Colgate Precision Compact toothbrush had significantly higher (p < 0.001) IAE means, compared to the Oral-B 35 toothbrush, on both anterior and posterior tooth shapes and at each of the brushing weights tested. When all factors tested were combined, the total IAE for the Colgate Precision Compact toothbrush was significantly superior (p < 0.001) to the Oral-B 35 toothbrush.

摘要

使用一种旨在模拟临床刷牙动作和压力的实验室装置,对高露洁精密紧凑型软质地牙刷和欧乐-B 35型牙刷进行了比较。对于测试的三种刷牙重量(250、500或750克)中的每一种,每次垂直或水平刷牙序列的刷牙时间均为60秒。通过测量放置在模拟前牙或后牙周围的压敏纸上刷牙行程的最大宽度来确定牙间隙清洁效果(IAE)。对于每种刷牙动作、牙齿形状和刷牙重量,对每种设计的24支牙刷进行了评估。在前牙上使用垂直刷牙动作时,在250克和750克刷牙重量下,高露洁精密紧凑型牙刷的IAE平均值显著高于欧乐-B 35型牙刷(p < 0.001)。在横跨后牙形状的牙齿进行垂直刷牙时,在测试的250、500和750克每种刷牙重量下,高露洁精密紧凑型牙刷的IAE值均显著高于欧乐-B 35型牙刷(p < 0.001)。在水平刷牙动作中,与欧乐-B 35型牙刷相比,高露洁精密紧凑型牙刷在前牙和后牙形状以及测试的每种刷牙重量下的IAE平均值均显著更高(p < 0.001)。当所有测试因素综合起来时,高露洁精密紧凑型牙刷的总IAE显著优于欧乐-B 35型牙刷(p < 0.001)。

相似文献

1
Laboratory interproximal access efficacy of two compact manual toothbrushes.两款紧凑型手动牙刷的实验室邻面清洁效果
J Clin Dent. 1994;4(4):111-3.
2
Laboratory interproximal access efficacy comparison of a rippled bristles toothbrush and a flat manual toothbrush.波纹刷毛牙刷和平头手动牙刷的实验室邻面清洁效果比较
J Clin Dent. 1993;4(3):82-4.
3
Comparative laboratory evaluation of two new toothbrushes regarding interproximal access efficacy.两种新型牙刷在邻面清洁效果方面的对比实验室评估
J Clin Dent. 1993;4 Suppl D:D1-4.
4
Comparative laboratory evaluation of three toothbrushes regarding interproximal access efficacy.三种牙刷在邻面清洁效果方面的对比实验室评估。
J Clin Dent. 1992;3(Suppl C):C5-8.
5
Comparison of the laboratory interproximal access efficacy of the Colgate precision toothbrush and the Crest complete toothbrush.高露洁精准牙刷与佳洁士全效牙刷实验室邻面清洁效果比较
J Clin Dent. 1993;4 Suppl D:D5-7.
6
Laboratory evaluations of interproximal access of two differently bristled manual toothbrushes.两种刷毛不同的手动牙刷邻面清洁效果的实验室评估。
J Clin Dent. 1993;4(3):85-7.
7
Laboratory interproximal access efficacy comparison of bi-level and flat bristled toothbrushes.双层刷毛和平头刷毛牙刷的实验室邻面清洁效果比较
J Clin Dent. 1994;4(4):128-30.
8
Laboratory evaluations of elmex inter X toothbrushes for interproximal access efficacy and posterior tooth surface cleaning.elmex inter X牙刷的邻面清洁效果及后牙表面清洁的实验室评估。
J Clin Dent. 2002;13(6):249-52.
9
Three laboratory assessments of a new triple-head toothbrush and the Oral-B 40 toothbrush.对一款新型三头牙刷和欧乐B 40牙刷进行的三项实验室评估。
J Clin Dent. 2005;16(1):6-10.
10
Laboratory assessment of the Sensodyne Mikro Aktiv extra soft toothbrush and the Oral-B indicator soft toothbrush.
J Clin Dent. 2008;19(2):55-8.