• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种新型牙刷在邻面清洁效果方面的对比实验室评估

Comparative laboratory evaluation of two new toothbrushes regarding interproximal access efficacy.

作者信息

Yankell S L, Shi X, Emling R C

机构信息

University of Pennsylvania School of Dental Medicine, Philadelphia.

出版信息

J Clin Dent. 1993;4 Suppl D:D1-4.

PMID:8397835
Abstract

The Colgate Precision toothbrush and the Crest Complete toothbrush were compared using a laboratory device designed to simulate clinical toothbrushing motions and pressures, allowing measurement of interproximal access efficacy. The toothbrushing time was sixty seconds for each vertical or horizontal toothbrushing motion and for each of the three brushing weights tested (250, 500 or 750g). Interproximal access efficacy was determined by measuring the maximum width of the brushing stroke on pressure-sensitive paper placed around simulated anterior or posterior-shaped teeth. Twenty-four toothbrushes of each design were evaluated for each toothbrushing motion, tooth shape and toothbrushing weight for a total of 576 measurements. Using vertical toothbrushing motions the Colgate Precision toothbrush had significantly higher (p < 0.01) interproximal access efficacy mean values, compared to the Crest Complete toothbrush on both anterior and posterior tooth shapes and at each of the brushing weights tested. Using the horizontal toothbrushing motion on anterior-shaped teeth, the interproximal access efficacy for the Colgate Precision toothbrush was significantly greater (p < 0.05) than the Crest Complete toothbrush at 750g of brushing weight. With horizontal toothbrushing across posterior-shaped teeth, interproximal access efficacy values for the Colgate Precision toothbrush were significantly greater (p < 0.01) than the Crest Complete toothbrush at the 250, 500 and 750g brushing weights tested.

摘要

使用一种旨在模拟临床刷牙动作和压力的实验室设备对高露洁精准牙刷和佳洁士全效牙刷进行了比较,该设备可测量牙间隙清洁效果。每次垂直或水平刷牙动作以及测试的三种刷牙力度(250克、500克或750克)中的每一种的刷牙时间均为60秒。通过测量放置在模拟前牙或后牙形状牙齿周围的压敏纸上刷牙行程的最大宽度来确定牙间隙清洁效果。对于每种刷牙动作、牙齿形状和刷牙力度,对每种设计的24支牙刷进行评估,总共进行576次测量。在垂直刷牙动作中,与佳洁士全效牙刷相比,高露洁精准牙刷在前后牙形状以及测试的每种刷牙力度下,牙间隙清洁效果的平均值均显著更高(p < 0.01)。在前牙形状上使用水平刷牙动作时,在750克刷牙力度下高露洁精准牙刷的牙间隙清洁效果显著优于佳洁士全效牙刷(p < 0.05)。在横跨后牙形状进行水平刷牙时,在测试的250克、500克和750克刷牙力度下,高露洁精准牙刷的牙间隙清洁效果值均显著高于佳洁士全效牙刷(p < 0.01)。

相似文献

1
Comparative laboratory evaluation of two new toothbrushes regarding interproximal access efficacy.两种新型牙刷在邻面清洁效果方面的对比实验室评估
J Clin Dent. 1993;4 Suppl D:D1-4.
2
Comparison of the laboratory interproximal access efficacy of the Colgate precision toothbrush and the Crest complete toothbrush.高露洁精准牙刷与佳洁士全效牙刷实验室邻面清洁效果比较
J Clin Dent. 1993;4 Suppl D:D5-7.
3
Laboratory interproximal access efficacy comparison of a rippled bristles toothbrush and a flat manual toothbrush.波纹刷毛牙刷和平头手动牙刷的实验室邻面清洁效果比较
J Clin Dent. 1993;4(3):82-4.
4
Laboratory interproximal access efficacy of two compact manual toothbrushes.两款紧凑型手动牙刷的实验室邻面清洁效果
J Clin Dent. 1994;4(4):111-3.
5
Comparative laboratory evaluation of three toothbrushes regarding interproximal access efficacy.三种牙刷在邻面清洁效果方面的对比实验室评估。
J Clin Dent. 1992;3(Suppl C):C5-8.
6
Laboratory evaluations of interproximal access of two differently bristled manual toothbrushes.两种刷毛不同的手动牙刷邻面清洁效果的实验室评估。
J Clin Dent. 1993;4(3):85-7.
7
Laboratory evaluations of elmex inter X toothbrushes for interproximal access efficacy and posterior tooth surface cleaning.elmex inter X牙刷的邻面清洁效果及后牙表面清洁的实验室评估。
J Clin Dent. 2002;13(6):249-52.
8
Laboratory interproximal access efficacy comparison of bi-level and flat bristled toothbrushes.双层刷毛和平头刷毛牙刷的实验室邻面清洁效果比较
J Clin Dent. 1994;4(4):128-30.
9
Three laboratory assessments of a new triple-head toothbrush and the Oral-B 40 toothbrush.对一款新型三头牙刷和欧乐B 40牙刷进行的三项实验室评估。
J Clin Dent. 2005;16(1):6-10.
10
Laboratory evaluation of the reach tooth & gum care toothbrush and three additional manual toothbrushes for subgingival access.针对可深入龈下清洁的舒适达护龈固齿牙刷及另外三款手动牙刷的实验室评估。
J Clin Dent. 1998;9(1):1-4.