• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估受虐待风险儿童的安全性:决策模型

Assessing the safety of children at risk of maltreatment: decision-making models.

作者信息

DePanfilis D, Scannapieco M

机构信息

School of Social Work, University of Maryland at Baltimore.

出版信息

Child Welfare. 1994 May-Jun;73(3):229-45.

PMID:8005017
Abstract

Child protective service caseworkers must make difficult decisions about the safety of maltreated children. Decision-making models for helping staff members balance the dual roles of child protection and family preservation are increasing. Results of a review of 10 models suggest that although some criteria overlap in these models, there are also wide differences in definitions, purposes, and the level of research support for the criteria being used to guide decision-making.

摘要

儿童保护服务工作者必须就受虐儿童的安全做出艰难决策。帮助工作人员平衡儿童保护和家庭维护双重角色的决策模型日益增多。对10种模型的综述结果表明,尽管这些模型中的一些标准存在重叠,但在定义、目的以及用于指导决策的标准的研究支持水平方面也存在很大差异。

相似文献

1
Assessing the safety of children at risk of maltreatment: decision-making models.评估受虐待风险儿童的安全性:决策模型
Child Welfare. 1994 May-Jun;73(3):229-45.
2
Family group decision making: protecting children and women.家庭团体决策:保护儿童和妇女。
Child Welfare. 2000 Mar-Apr;79(2):131-58.
3
Placement decisions and disparities among aboriginal groups: an application of the decision making ecology through multi-level analysis.原住民群体之间的安置决策和差异:通过多层次分析应用决策生态系统。
Child Abuse Negl. 2010 Jan;34(1):57-69. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2009.08.009. Epub 2010 Jan 6.
4
Does family group decision making affect child welfare outcomes? Findings from a randomized control study.家庭小组决策是否会影响儿童福利结果?一项随机对照研究的结果
Child Welfare. 2008;87(4):35-54.
5
Evaluating intensive family preservation programs: a methodological review.评估强化家庭保全项目:方法学综述
Pediatrics. 1996 Apr;97(4):535-42.
6
Safety and risk assessment frameworks: overview and implications for child maltreatment fatalities.安全与风险评估框架:儿童虐待致死案例概述及影响
Child Welfare. 2013;92(2):143-60.
7
Inter-rater reliability of the Illinois Structured Decision Support Protocol.伊利诺伊州结构化决策支持协议的评分者间信度。
Child Abuse Negl. 2006 Jun;30(6):679-89. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2005.12.004. Epub 2006 Jun 19.
8
Risk and safety assessment in child welfare: instrument comparisons.儿童福利中的风险与安全评估:工具比较
J Evid Based Soc Work. 2008;5(1-2):31-56. doi: 10.1300/J394v05n01_03.
9
Social services and social support: blended programs for families at risk of child maltreatment.社会服务与社会支持:针对有儿童虐待风险家庭的综合项目。
Child Welfare. 1988 Mar-Apr;67(2):161-74.
10
Decision-making in child protective services: a comparison of selected risk-assessment systems.儿童保护服务中的决策制定:选定风险评估系统的比较
Child Welfare. 1993 Sep-Oct;72(5):441-52.

引用本文的文献

1
Caseworker assessments of risk for recurrent maltreatment: association with case-specific risk factors and re-reports.个案工作者对再次虐待风险的评估:与特定案例风险因素及再次报告的关联
Child Abuse Negl. 2008 Mar;32(3):377-91. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2007.06.006.