Child Protection Research Center, American Humane Association, Centennial, CO, USA.
Child Abuse Negl. 2010 Jan;34(1):57-69. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2009.08.009. Epub 2010 Jan 6.
This paper examined the relative influence of clinical and organizational characteristics on the decision to place a child in out-of-home care at the conclusion of a child maltreatment investigation. It tested the hypothesis that extraneous factors, specifically, organizational characteristics, impact the decision to place a child in out-of-home care. A secondary aim was to identify possible decision making influences related to disparities in placement decisions tied to Aboriginal children. Research suggests that the Aboriginal status of the child and structural risk factors affecting the family, such as poverty and poor housing, substantially account for this overrepresentation.
The decision to place a child in out-of-home care was examined using data from the Canadian Incidence Study of Reported Child Abuse and Neglect. This child welfare dataset collected information about the results of nearly 5,000 child maltreatment investigations as well as a description of the characteristics of the workers and organization responsible for conducting those investigations. Multi-level statistical models were developed using MPlus software, which can accommodate dichotomous outcome variables, which are more reflective of decision making in child welfare. MPlus allows the specific case of the logistic link function for binary outcome variables under maximum likelihood estimation.
Final models revealed the importance of the number of Aboriginal reports to an organization as a key second level predictor of the placement decision. It is the only second level factor that remains in the final model. This finding was very stable when tested over several different levels of proportionate caseload representation ranging from greater than 50% to 20% of the caseload.
Disparities among Aboriginal children in child welfare decision making were identified at the agency level.
The study provides additional evidence supporting the possibility that one source of overrepresentation of Aboriginal children in the Canadian foster care system is a lack of appropriate resources at the agency or community level.
本文研究了临床和组织特征对儿童虐待调查结束时将儿童安置在家庭以外环境中的决策的相对影响。它检验了一个假设,即外部因素,特别是组织特征,会影响将儿童安置在家庭以外环境中的决策。次要目标是确定与与原住民儿童有关的安置决策差异有关的可能决策影响因素。研究表明,儿童的原住民身份以及影响家庭的结构性风险因素,如贫困和住房条件差,在很大程度上解释了这种过度代表现象。
使用来自加拿大报告儿童虐待和忽视发生率研究的数据来检查将儿童安置在家庭以外环境中的决策。该儿童福利数据集收集了近 5000 起儿童虐待调查结果的信息,以及负责进行这些调查的工作人员和组织的特征描述。使用 MPlus 软件开发了多水平统计模型,该软件可以适应二项式结果变量,这些变量更能反映儿童福利中的决策过程。MPlus 允许在最大似然估计下为二进制结果变量使用逻辑链接函数的特定情况。
最终模型揭示了组织中针对原住民的报告数量作为安置决策的关键二级预测因素的重要性。这是最终模型中唯一保留的二级因素。当在从大于 50%到 20%的案件比例的几个不同的比例案件代表性水平上进行测试时,这一发现非常稳定。
在机构层面确定了原住民儿童在儿童福利决策方面的差异。
该研究提供了更多证据支持这样一种可能性,即加拿大寄养系统中原住民儿童代表性过高的一个原因是机构或社区层面缺乏适当的资源。